Ed Reed
banner
ed-reed.bsky.social
Ed Reed
@ed-reed.bsky.social
Somewhere between Greta Thunberg and Harold Hamm. Editor of E-FWD and @energyvoice.bsky.social contributor.
Most excruciatingly: “Low-accuracy but high-tone analysts achieve the highest career promotion rates relative to their peers.”
October 25, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Interesting sense of betrayal against the federal government.
September 25, 2025 at 8:31 AM
Ah yes! Thanks that’s great.

Interesting points about collective failure, brings to mind the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
July 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM
Zonal pricing where the zone is determined by average income levels? That’s the only true solution to the post code lottery!
July 1, 2025 at 11:54 AM
Do you have a debunker/explainer by any chance?
July 1, 2025 at 11:49 AM
Always enjoy your Substack but thought this was super interesting.
April 8, 2025 at 9:37 AM
Sold!
April 5, 2025 at 10:00 AM
It’s an absolutely amazing country. And we only drove around it - very gingerly - in a Toyota Camry.
March 8, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Trees in this example are a means of energy storage - so it feels like solar needs to be coupled with batteries.
February 26, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Tesla is not about the car business. It’s a play on the Elon business.
January 29, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Growth/investment/capitalism often feels like it’s determined by who blinks first
January 29, 2025 at 8:53 AM
That is very interesting. Does it work the other way - if a climate change believer moves to the oil patch?
January 19, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Circe?
January 18, 2025 at 10:26 AM
Most writers just want people to read what they write! But they are also fond of things like paying bills.
January 16, 2025 at 8:23 AM
That CAR number is a real demonstration of how percentages can obscure! Also the number doesn’t include diesel gen?
But The Gambia!
January 15, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Strange for the NYT to say it’s unusual. Didn’t Exxon sue two investors last year to block votes on environmental issues.
January 7, 2025 at 4:28 PM