@dwthe2nd.bsky.social
Western Nebraska exile. Love my cats, my bike, and lentil soup.
Car go VROOM! So what if it means more kids are killed?
February 9, 2026 at 5:54 PM
Car go VROOM! So what if it means more kids are killed?
Sure thing, Boss. I just happen to think it’s bad form for a journalist to claim it’s no longer worth her time to report on Trump’s war on MN. And doing so gives the impression that things are better, right after Trump claimed to be softening on MN.
February 8, 2026 at 10:03 PM
Sure thing, Boss. I just happen to think it’s bad form for a journalist to claim it’s no longer worth her time to report on Trump’s war on MN. And doing so gives the impression that things are better, right after Trump claimed to be softening on MN.
I’m saying that if what you are bolstering also provides cover or carries water for Trump, you better be damn sure you’re right.
February 8, 2026 at 9:51 PM
I’m saying that if what you are bolstering also provides cover or carries water for Trump, you better be damn sure you’re right.
Trump and an outside journalist who is bored: Things are calming down in MN.
A local activist who has been on the front lines for months: No, not really at all.
You: I’m thinking Trump and the outsider know better and are being honest.
Seriously, please consider what you are supporting and why.
A local activist who has been on the front lines for months: No, not really at all.
You: I’m thinking Trump and the outsider know better and are being honest.
Seriously, please consider what you are supporting and why.
February 8, 2026 at 9:37 PM
Trump and an outside journalist who is bored: Things are calming down in MN.
A local activist who has been on the front lines for months: No, not really at all.
You: I’m thinking Trump and the outsider know better and are being honest.
Seriously, please consider what you are supporting and why.
A local activist who has been on the front lines for months: No, not really at all.
You: I’m thinking Trump and the outsider know better and are being honest.
Seriously, please consider what you are supporting and why.
Can you provide an example of a successful protest movement of this size that you approve of? I want to know what has worked when adhering to your rules of proper "opsec" and how.
February 3, 2026 at 4:46 PM
Can you provide an example of a successful protest movement of this size that you approve of? I want to know what has worked when adhering to your rules of proper "opsec" and how.
Take a breath. Drink some water. Then tell this to someone who is not online as much as we are. See what they think about Will Stancil being the most selfish, narcissistic, and reckless person you’ve ever seen.
February 1, 2026 at 3:16 AM
Take a breath. Drink some water. Then tell this to someone who is not online as much as we are. See what they think about Will Stancil being the most selfish, narcissistic, and reckless person you’ve ever seen.
How? To who? For what? Specifically
Seriously. Why can no one think one step beyond their current criticism of Stancil?
Seriously. Why can no one think one step beyond their current criticism of Stancil?
February 1, 2026 at 2:19 AM
How? To who? For what? Specifically
Seriously. Why can no one think one step beyond their current criticism of Stancil?
Seriously. Why can no one think one step beyond their current criticism of Stancil?
What they really want is to be granted the title of World's Most Based Leftist Online and claim all the rewards that title receives.
January 30, 2026 at 9:50 PM
What they really want is to be granted the title of World's Most Based Leftist Online and claim all the rewards that title receives.
Why are you unable to think exactly one step beyond you current objection to each individual comment? Can you not think holistically about a situation and surmise that there is not a single one-size-fits all rule for this but rather a multifaceted array of possible answers that work?
January 30, 2026 at 4:26 PM
Why are you unable to think exactly one step beyond you current objection to each individual comment? Can you not think holistically about a situation and surmise that there is not a single one-size-fits all rule for this but rather a multifaceted array of possible answers that work?
And I was responding to you relaying information you had no reason to know was true or not. You want to feed into the the mess but don’t want to take responsibility for doing so.
January 30, 2026 at 1:58 AM
And I was responding to you relaying information you had no reason to know was true or not. You want to feed into the the mess but don’t want to take responsibility for doing so.
You are getting your moral righteousness from what other people who say they, like Will, on the ground against ICE. You’re not but you sure act like you can’t preach to Will about it. Also, he denies it as you admit. Don’t you have any pause that maybe you are feeding into misinfo? of course not.
January 30, 2026 at 1:52 AM
You are getting your moral righteousness from what other people who say they, like Will, on the ground against ICE. You’re not but you sure act like you can’t preach to Will about it. Also, he denies it as you admit. Don’t you have any pause that maybe you are feeding into misinfo? of course not.
Stop using stolen valor to defend your shitty comment. “People on here said!” People on here say a lot of shit. If you don’t know, why speak up?
January 30, 2026 at 1:41 AM
Stop using stolen valor to defend your shitty comment. “People on here said!” People on here say a lot of shit. If you don’t know, why speak up?
I see your point, so thanks for answering my question.
Sorry to have wasted both our times on Generation Wars bullshit. I’ll mind myself better in the future.
Sorry to have wasted both our times on Generation Wars bullshit. I’ll mind myself better in the future.
January 29, 2026 at 9:47 PM
I see your point, so thanks for answering my question.
Sorry to have wasted both our times on Generation Wars bullshit. I’ll mind myself better in the future.
Sorry to have wasted both our times on Generation Wars bullshit. I’ll mind myself better in the future.
So they are not perfectly aligned but closer to right than wrong.
January 29, 2026 at 9:43 PM
So they are not perfectly aligned but closer to right than wrong.
What am I missing? Baby Boomer years were 1946-1965 and Gen X was 1965-the early 80s. So, those ages match up. Right?
January 29, 2026 at 9:40 PM
What am I missing? Baby Boomer years were 1946-1965 and Gen X was 1965-the early 80s. So, those ages match up. Right?
"Haha, look at this loser!"
January 28, 2026 at 2:31 PM
"Haha, look at this loser!"
Sure thing, boss. Keep up the good work! Continue policing language of people who agree with you.
January 24, 2026 at 7:28 PM
Sure thing, boss. Keep up the good work! Continue policing language of people who agree with you.
Because he does stand for something (getting rid of ICE) and that is not watering down the idea of “Abolishing” ICE. The goal is the same. You just want your preferred phrase to be used.
If your goal is to win elections, you should think about how you are helping by Posting.
If your goal is to win elections, you should think about how you are helping by Posting.
January 24, 2026 at 7:25 PM
Because he does stand for something (getting rid of ICE) and that is not watering down the idea of “Abolishing” ICE. The goal is the same. You just want your preferred phrase to be used.
If your goal is to win elections, you should think about how you are helping by Posting.
If your goal is to win elections, you should think about how you are helping by Posting.
The OP said that destroying ICE as an agency is mandatory. You are upset that he won’t use th exact phrase you want him to use. And you think that *that* is the problem.
Taking your stated goal seriously for a second, it seems like you don’t actually understand what he said in the first place.
Taking your stated goal seriously for a second, it seems like you don’t actually understand what he said in the first place.
January 24, 2026 at 7:23 PM
The OP said that destroying ICE as an agency is mandatory. You are upset that he won’t use th exact phrase you want him to use. And you think that *that* is the problem.
Taking your stated goal seriously for a second, it seems like you don’t actually understand what he said in the first place.
Taking your stated goal seriously for a second, it seems like you don’t actually understand what he said in the first place.
Glad to know what your priorities are.
January 24, 2026 at 7:09 PM
Glad to know what your priorities are.
This is the fight you want you have? It only counts if you say the magic words?
January 24, 2026 at 7:05 PM
This is the fight you want you have? It only counts if you say the magic words?
Some people seriously believe this! Just…why? Why would anyone do this for the Broncos? (Or any team, really, but the 2026 Broncos? The most boring #1 seed in the last decade)
January 18, 2026 at 2:41 AM
Some people seriously believe this! Just…why? Why would anyone do this for the Broncos? (Or any team, really, but the 2026 Broncos? The most boring #1 seed in the last decade)