LightNews LightNews
banner
drrayblanchette.bsky.social
@drrayblanchette.bsky.social
53 followers 91 following 25 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
drrayblanchette.bsky.social
What shall it profit a man if he should gain the whole world, yet lose his own soul? For what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
Mark 8 v.36-38 I can guarantee that neither this president, his wife, or any of his children give a damn & neither any of the sycophants that blindly follow him.
May 12, 2025 at 6:10 PM
Reposted
doyleinstitute.bsky.social
May 8, 2025 at 5:15 PM
drrayblanchette.bsky.social
I personally believe that he’s going to try & hurt her. I love the fight, but the reality in America is that she really needs to be careful …
May 7, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Reposted
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Here's the original preliminary injunction (with the image modification that I covered previously writing in a "no Gitmo end-run" amendment): storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER - AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: In light of the issues raised during the April 28, 2025 hearing, this Court modifies a portion of its April 18, 2025 preliminary injunction 64 . This modification preserves the status quo as outlined in this Court's preliminary injunction. See Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Xia, 2024 WL 3447849, at *6-7 (E.D.N.Y. July 9, 2024) (collecting cases modifying preliminary injunctions pending appeal in order to preserve the status quo). Defendants have represented to this court that that removals from Guantanamo Bay to third countries have been executed by the Department of Defense without the Department of Homeland Security's direction or knowledge, see Dkt 72, and the Court makes no finding on the accuracy of this assignment of responsibility but, in an abundance of caution, ORDERS that, prior to removing, or allowing or permitting another agency to remove, an alien from Guantanamo Bay to a third country, Defendants must comport with the terms of the April 18, 2025 preliminary injunction by providing the due-process guarantees set forth in Dkt. 64 at 46-47. At the April 28, 2025 hearing, the status of the Guantanamo Bay Detention Center was debated. The Court declines to resolve if transportation to this base is a deportation to a third country despite the United States' exercise of jurisdiction and control over the base. Given the position taken by the Government that the deportation from Guantanamo to third countries was not at the direction, behest or control of the Department of Homeland Security, a debated issue to be resolved once preliminary discovery has been conducted, this Court ORDERS that, after taking custody of an alien, Defendants may not cede custody or control in any manner that prevents an alien from receiving the due-process guarantees outlined in the April 18, 2025 preliminary injunction. (BIB) (Entered: 04/30/2025)
May 7, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Reposted
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Order: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com
May 7, 2025 at 8:51 PM
drrayblanchette.bsky.social
Though she could be stalking Justin Trudeau at his home in Canada, looking for a real man with bigger more manly hands & who doesn’t leave Cheeto dust all over the pillows … But I don’t really care … DO YOU ???
May 7, 2025 at 10:06 PM
drrayblanchette.bsky.social
I really like Finn …
May 7, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Reposted
bgriebs.bsky.social
Finn and I do not.
May 7, 2025 at 9:42 PM
drrayblanchette.bsky.social
I don’t really care either … DO YOU ???
May 7, 2025 at 10:01 PM