It’s me Drew. 🔧 Tech & Dev – Always building something, usually in C# 🌐 Web & Cloud – Azure, SaaS, Twilio 🤖 AI & Automation 🚀 Bootstrapped Startups 🎸 Austin, TX 🗳️ Occasional Politics – when triggered
The companies that keep hiring entry and junior people will control a big chunk of the future senior talent. If everyone else stops training people, those homegrown seniors will be incredibly valuable. They will need long-term retention strategies again, maybe even pension-style incentives.
November 30, 2025 at 8:21 PM
The companies that keep hiring entry and junior people will control a big chunk of the future senior talent. If everyone else stops training people, those homegrown seniors will be incredibly valuable. They will need long-term retention strategies again, maybe even pension-style incentives.
Agree. A feed that mostly sticks to friends and friends-of-friends might sound nice, but it’s not built for growth. Then layer on stricter content rules and upcoming fees, and the outlook gets pretty cloudy.
October 6, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Agree. A feed that mostly sticks to friends and friends-of-friends might sound nice, but it’s not built for growth. Then layer on stricter content rules and upcoming fees, and the outlook gets pretty cloudy.
The first admission of ChatGPT history being used for more than just chat... Even Meta is jealous about the amount of personal detail OpenAI is gathering.
October 6, 2025 at 1:53 PM
The first admission of ChatGPT history being used for more than just chat... Even Meta is jealous about the amount of personal detail OpenAI is gathering.
Well, we do play Fox News 24/7 in all US military installations. Just seems like more of the same. I don't think the COs have an issue with this sort of thing anymore.
October 5, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Well, we do play Fox News 24/7 in all US military installations. Just seems like more of the same. I don't think the COs have an issue with this sort of thing anymore.
Seems like the only reason to bring them all together like this. Leverage group pressure and immediately dismiss those who don’t go along to make the message clear.
September 26, 2025 at 4:55 AM
Seems like the only reason to bring them all together like this. Leverage group pressure and immediately dismiss those who don’t go along to make the message clear.
If they really wanted to reduce H-1B visa holders to protect jobs for US citizens they would just reduce the number of new approvals. This yearly fee isn’t that. This is to set up a grift where the President can waive the fee for companies that offer him something.
Critical part of the President's new $100,000 charge for H1-B visas: The Administration can also offer a $100,000 discount to any person, company, or industry that it wants. Replacing rules with arbitrary discretion.
Want visas? You know who to call and who to flatter.
September 20, 2025 at 3:03 PM
If they really wanted to reduce H-1B visa holders to protect jobs for US citizens they would just reduce the number of new approvals. This yearly fee isn’t that. This is to set up a grift where the President can waive the fee for companies that offer him something.
Will be funny if consumers end up using AI agents to intentionally shape their online personas as price sensitive via automated browsing to combat personalized dynamic pricing.
July 27, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Will be funny if consumers end up using AI agents to intentionally shape their online personas as price sensitive via automated browsing to combat personalized dynamic pricing.