DrCyanide3D
@drcyanide3d.bsky.social
Iron Man and 3D printing enthusiast
File this under "Evidence that MAGA failed elementary school math"
December 26, 2025 at 6:13 PM
File this under "Evidence that MAGA failed elementary school math"
🥱 so you're a broken record with no thoughts of your own?
The youngest people who voted for Bill Clinton are already closer to dead than they are to being newborns. No one's defending Bill, but we all see MAGA breaking their backs to ignore Donald.
The youngest people who voted for Bill Clinton are already closer to dead than they are to being newborns. No one's defending Bill, but we all see MAGA breaking their backs to ignore Donald.
December 26, 2025 at 6:10 PM
🥱 so you're a broken record with no thoughts of your own?
The youngest people who voted for Bill Clinton are already closer to dead than they are to being newborns. No one's defending Bill, but we all see MAGA breaking their backs to ignore Donald.
The youngest people who voted for Bill Clinton are already closer to dead than they are to being newborns. No one's defending Bill, but we all see MAGA breaking their backs to ignore Donald.
🥱 Donald is the same kind of person as Epstein. That's why he bragged about going into the dressing rooms of Mrs Teen USA whenever he wanted. He's been redacting suspects named in the Epstein files because he's one of them.
December 26, 2025 at 5:28 PM
🥱 Donald is the same kind of person as Epstein. That's why he bragged about going into the dressing rooms of Mrs Teen USA whenever he wanted. He's been redacting suspects named in the Epstein files because he's one of them.
🤣🤣🤣 This is the funniest account ever! People talk about what they think about, and nobody's randomly thinking about Bill Clinton - a guy who stopped being president 25 years ago!
Donald did nothing to bring Epstein in, he was just sitting in the chair when it happened. Donald is a sex offender.
Donald did nothing to bring Epstein in, he was just sitting in the chair when it happened. Donald is a sex offender.
December 26, 2025 at 3:49 PM
🤣🤣🤣 This is the funniest account ever! People talk about what they think about, and nobody's randomly thinking about Bill Clinton - a guy who stopped being president 25 years ago!
Donald did nothing to bring Epstein in, he was just sitting in the chair when it happened. Donald is a sex offender.
Donald did nothing to bring Epstein in, he was just sitting in the chair when it happened. Donald is a sex offender.
🤣 That's so cute! Liberals have been saying to lock Bill up if he's in the files for over a year now, long before the files came out! Nobody thinks Bill is innocent, which is why nobody is trying to protect him from accusations!
December 26, 2025 at 3:42 PM
🤣 That's so cute! Liberals have been saying to lock Bill up if he's in the files for over a year now, long before the files came out! Nobody thinks Bill is innocent, which is why nobody is trying to protect him from accusations!
Cute, but it's more accurate to say "Liberals don't want a single person named in there to be in politics. Liberals want them all tried and behind bars. MAGA wants to ignore the pedofiles they've raised through the ranks."
December 26, 2025 at 3:37 PM
Cute, but it's more accurate to say "Liberals don't want a single person named in there to be in politics. Liberals want them all tried and behind bars. MAGA wants to ignore the pedofiles they've raised through the ranks."
🤣 If you wanted 60 sources you'd get off AI too! You'd go to Nielsen's website for one source, iSpot for another, VideoAMP for a third, and ComScore for a fourth, etc. You wouldn't trust an AI that blindly repeats what MSM and drunk social media users post - and treats both as equally valid!
December 26, 2025 at 3:32 PM
🤣 If you wanted 60 sources you'd get off AI too! You'd go to Nielsen's website for one source, iSpot for another, VideoAMP for a third, and ComScore for a fourth, etc. You wouldn't trust an AI that blindly repeats what MSM and drunk social media users post - and treats both as equally valid!
Get off Copilot, Gemini, ChatGPT, Grok, and all that other nonsense. All of them lie to you. Go to Nielsen's own website and find where they publish the data. You'll know the facts for yourself, not whatever the AI picks up from mainstream news, Reddit posts, and Twitter.
December 26, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Get off Copilot, Gemini, ChatGPT, Grok, and all that other nonsense. All of them lie to you. Go to Nielsen's own website and find where they publish the data. You'll know the facts for yourself, not whatever the AI picks up from mainstream news, Reddit posts, and Twitter.
😮💨 By that logic the program was huge in 2021, 2022, and 2023. Had you even heard the 2024 ratings before a few days ago? Must've been supressed because it was so huge under Biden!
I wouldn't expect a follow-up news story for "these numbers that only broadcasters care about went up a little".
I wouldn't expect a follow-up news story for "these numbers that only broadcasters care about went up a little".
December 26, 2025 at 3:15 PM
😮💨 By that logic the program was huge in 2021, 2022, and 2023. Had you even heard the 2024 ratings before a few days ago? Must've been supressed because it was so huge under Biden!
I wouldn't expect a follow-up news story for "these numbers that only broadcasters care about went up a little".
I wouldn't expect a follow-up news story for "these numbers that only broadcasters care about went up a little".
I'll ask again - did you get the 7M number from an AI? Because AI is famous for making up answers and lying/hallucinating. Even when they post source links there's a huge amount of the time when the source gives a different answer than the AI. You can not trust AI for facts.
December 26, 2025 at 3:08 PM
I'll ask again - did you get the 7M number from an AI? Because AI is famous for making up answers and lying/hallucinating. Even when they post source links there's a huge amount of the time when the source gives a different answer than the AI. You can not trust AI for facts.
Interestingly, waiting might actually give a less accurate comparison to 2024. Looks like the "preliminary" name is new for 2025 and reflects that they don't have streaming totals yet - in other words, "preliminary" is how all view counts have been since 2007.
variety.com/2025/tv/news...
variety.com/2025/tv/news...
Nielsen Will Need More Time to Disclose Full Audience Ratings in Streaming Era
Nielsen will need as much as 2 to 3 days to determine full audience ratings for video content in order to include linear and streaming viewership
variety.com
December 26, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Interestingly, waiting might actually give a less accurate comparison to 2024. Looks like the "preliminary" name is new for 2025 and reflects that they don't have streaming totals yet - in other words, "preliminary" is how all view counts have been since 2007.
variety.com/2025/tv/news...
variety.com/2025/tv/news...
Exactly the same as any other year. Try and find the 2023 numbers, or 2022, or 2021. I haven't been able to, does that mean there's some conspiracy to hide how successful the program was under it's old management? Or does it mean that Nielsen's data is paywalled/restricted to certain companies?
December 26, 2025 at 1:44 PM
Exactly the same as any other year. Try and find the 2023 numbers, or 2022, or 2021. I haven't been able to, does that mean there's some conspiracy to hide how successful the program was under it's old management? Or does it mean that Nielsen's data is paywalled/restricted to certain companies?
Your original post claimed it "was watched by just under 7 million total viewers, which is up around 500,000 from last year."
Let's do some math!
7,000,000 - 500,000 = 6,500,000 for 2024.
Woops!
There were 4,100,000 viewers in 2024, so your source was wrong.
The odds are the same as any year.
Let's do some math!
7,000,000 - 500,000 = 6,500,000 for 2024.
Woops!
There were 4,100,000 viewers in 2024, so your source was wrong.
The odds are the same as any year.
December 26, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Your original post claimed it "was watched by just under 7 million total viewers, which is up around 500,000 from last year."
Let's do some math!
7,000,000 - 500,000 = 6,500,000 for 2024.
Woops!
There were 4,100,000 viewers in 2024, so your source was wrong.
The odds are the same as any year.
Let's do some math!
7,000,000 - 500,000 = 6,500,000 for 2024.
Woops!
There were 4,100,000 viewers in 2024, so your source was wrong.
The odds are the same as any year.
The 2024 numbers are final though, and they fall far short of what you were spreading. So I'll ask again, what's your source? Because it seems like you asked a hallucination machine to write what you wanted to read.
December 26, 2025 at 3:41 AM
The 2024 numbers are final though, and they fall far short of what you were spreading. So I'll ask again, what's your source? Because it seems like you asked a hallucination machine to write what you wanted to read.
Where'd you copy those numbers from? That reads like an AI hallucinating.
Nielsen says 2024 was 4.1M viewers. 500k more would be 4.6M, not nearly 7M. Nielsen's preliminary data says 2025 is averaged 2.65M viewers.
Nielsen says 2024 was 4.1M viewers. 500k more would be 4.6M, not nearly 7M. Nielsen's preliminary data says 2025 is averaged 2.65M viewers.
December 26, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Where'd you copy those numbers from? That reads like an AI hallucinating.
Nielsen says 2024 was 4.1M viewers. 500k more would be 4.6M, not nearly 7M. Nielsen's preliminary data says 2025 is averaged 2.65M viewers.
Nielsen says 2024 was 4.1M viewers. 500k more would be 4.6M, not nearly 7M. Nielsen's preliminary data says 2025 is averaged 2.65M viewers.
I just went through trying to get DaVinci Resolve to work on Linux. It's relatively easy to get running, but the free version can't handle MP4 files, nor anything encoded with H.264/265 or AAC audio. You either convert everything with ffmpeg or just use a different program, like Kdenlive.
December 25, 2025 at 12:05 AM
I just went through trying to get DaVinci Resolve to work on Linux. It's relatively easy to get running, but the free version can't handle MP4 files, nor anything encoded with H.264/265 or AAC audio. You either convert everything with ffmpeg or just use a different program, like Kdenlive.
I feel like the answer is whenever it becomes unmanageable. You either run out of space to store them, or your storage system gets so overloaded you can't find what you're looking for.
December 23, 2025 at 7:34 AM
I feel like the answer is whenever it becomes unmanageable. You either run out of space to store them, or your storage system gets so overloaded you can't find what you're looking for.
I've heard of two left feet, but this looks like two right feet? Her left foot looks like it bends outwards to me.
December 23, 2025 at 7:25 AM
I've heard of two left feet, but this looks like two right feet? Her left foot looks like it bends outwards to me.
The warning a car gives when you're leaving your lane isn't running on Amazon cloud servers or on Nvidia GPUs.
December 23, 2025 at 1:30 AM
The warning a car gives when you're leaving your lane isn't running on Amazon cloud servers or on Nvidia GPUs.
One picture can make the difference. My sister has medical conditions that stump the Mayo Clinic because none of their documented examples look like what she's got. Just one other example could help doctors know how to better manage symptoms. Was such an example missed because it wasn't shared?
December 23, 2025 at 1:28 AM
One picture can make the difference. My sister has medical conditions that stump the Mayo Clinic because none of their documented examples look like what she's got. Just one other example could help doctors know how to better manage symptoms. Was such an example missed because it wasn't shared?
If a picture can save lives then denying consent to see that picture is unethical.
December 23, 2025 at 1:13 AM
If a picture can save lives then denying consent to see that picture is unethical.
Holy strawman, Batman! When did I defend how Amazon does things, or claim we need to make some all powerful AI to do anything? NEVER!
Time to come back to basics. Is AI that helps identify cancer good? Is AI that helps drivers avoid car crashes good? Those aren't datacenter monsters, they exist now
Time to come back to basics. Is AI that helps identify cancer good? Is AI that helps drivers avoid car crashes good? Those aren't datacenter monsters, they exist now
December 23, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Holy strawman, Batman! When did I defend how Amazon does things, or claim we need to make some all powerful AI to do anything? NEVER!
Time to come back to basics. Is AI that helps identify cancer good? Is AI that helps drivers avoid car crashes good? Those aren't datacenter monsters, they exist now
Time to come back to basics. Is AI that helps identify cancer good? Is AI that helps drivers avoid car crashes good? Those aren't datacenter monsters, they exist now
When it comes to deidentified medical information I vehemently disagree. The patent loses nothing by medical researchers, textbooks, instructors, or AI models being able to look at an image of their lung or a biopsy. Conversely, restricting access to that example makes it harder to heal others.
December 23, 2025 at 1:04 AM
When it comes to deidentified medical information I vehemently disagree. The patent loses nothing by medical researchers, textbooks, instructors, or AI models being able to look at an image of their lung or a biopsy. Conversely, restricting access to that example makes it harder to heal others.
There are multiple datacenters that run on 100% renewables, not sure how many are AI. Deidentified is what's required for HIPAA compliance, and it's a step taken by the company saving/sharing the medical records, not the AI devs. You think people would revoke consent to ID cancer?
December 23, 2025 at 12:54 AM
There are multiple datacenters that run on 100% renewables, not sure how many are AI. Deidentified is what's required for HIPAA compliance, and it's a step taken by the company saving/sharing the medical records, not the AI devs. You think people would revoke consent to ID cancer?
Deidentified medical imaging isn't a HIPAA violation, so zero are needed. Likewise coal or diesel generators aren't needed to power servers (they work just fine off of renewables or nuclear), meaning there's no need to acidify the oceans either.
December 22, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Deidentified medical imaging isn't a HIPAA violation, so zero are needed. Likewise coal or diesel generators aren't needed to power servers (they work just fine off of renewables or nuclear), meaning there's no need to acidify the oceans either.