I clicked through to ask this question. Thank you for already answering it.

That's straight out of an Iain Banks novel. Look to Windward, from memory. Or The Player of Games. It's called drone slapping where a drone is assigned to follow someone wherever they go and stop them doing bad things. In The Culture it is the ultimate humiliation.

Yes, it's one factor.

I don't think that samples per day is an appropriate metric to determine sample size.

Yes, that's just poor mass spec. I think it has been established that you need a minimum of 6-7 points across a peak for accurate quantification.
pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...

Do you mean scans? Because, yes. That's not okay.

The headline remains misleading. They're banning men from the women's category. Not women.

I'm afraid you have been misinformed. The Olympics are banning *men* from *women's* events. Trans-identified women are still welcome to compete there, providing they are not taking performance enhancing drugs, such as testosterone.

Shocked. Shocked, I tell you.

Why has this event appropriated the suffragette colours yet seems to have no direct relevance to issues affecting women? Is this more of your Green Party "values", George? Muddle and confuse everything to do with women's rights.

I forgot @sharrond62, @mara_yamauchi, @Scienceofsport. There are many more, but these legends lead the charge.

Congratulations in particular to @FondOfBeetles, @cathydevine56
, @runthinkwrite and all the other scientists over on the other twitter who have patiently being accumulating evidence and challenging the misinformation spread from activists.
x.com/FondOfBeetle...

I'm interested to hear your examples of Dawkins' or Rowling's luck or privilege that got them where they are. Or examples of where they have "become incapable of self reflection & growth". I'm sure you have these examples to hand & aren't just lashing out at prominent critics of gender ideology. 🙃

Usury.

I went to twitter just to like and RT this tweet.

No. You are experiencing relentless *defence*. People are *defending* their sex-based rights to safety, privacy and freedom from discrimination. Values people like *you* are attacking. Maybe time for you to reflect on this classic Mitchell & Webb sketch.

Do you mean this data? How stupid do you have to be to base a lawsuit on denying this?

Toilets and bathrooms are sex segregated, not “gendered”, because that is the important factor for safety, privacy, dignity etc, especially for women and girls.

Arguing, as you do here, that women can’t have boundaries because enforcing them is harmful to men, is rape culture.