DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
banner
dougmerritt.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
@dougmerritt.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
I'm a philomath (many interests; call it polymath-wanna-be) professional computer programmer in Silicon Valley, specializing in operating systems […]

🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://mathstodon.xyz/@dougmerritt, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact
Pinned
"A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject." -- Winston Churchill.

(Regarding someone who posted to me 1000% off-topic)
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
mysietch.wad
December 20, 2025 at 3:23 AM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
mastodon.radio
December 20, 2025 at 2:58 AM
December 15, 2025 at 9:57 PM
@johncarlosbaez
This conceivably could be of interest to you, although it's 8 months old so you also may have heard of it already:
"Emily Riehl Makes Infinity Categories Elementary"
"Emily Riehl, one of the world’s leading category theorists, shares her vision for making infinity category theory […]
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
mathstodon.xyz
December 15, 2025 at 6:53 PM
They used to "laugh and call him nanes." Now they're all dead
December 14, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
They used to "laugh and call him nanes." Now they're all dead
December 14, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
So help me, I laughed
#shitpost #meme #distractedboyfriend
September 9, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
Another kid told me that if you walk around its perimeter three times backwards at midnight, it'll tile periodically.
October 31, 2025 at 4:42 PM
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@rg9119/115517974963538645

Tip: scroll down to "Hand drawn slides"
mathstodon.xyz
December 10, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
On average, how many rolls of an n-sided die would it take before the sum of your rolls is at least n?

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2025/12/10/rolling-dice/
December 10, 2025 at 3:12 PM
> unless I was trying to just remember details about something I already knew

That is in fact almost always what I use it for.

The times I need more than that, I don't just blindly trust it, but then I never did with simple web search, or human comments in forums, either.

I don't necessarily […]
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
mathstodon.xyz
December 10, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
OTD 1968: The Mother of All Demos, by Douglas Engelbart and William English.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY

I knew Bill English 20 years later when he was working for #SunMicrosystems.
December 9, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
OTD 1888: Hollereith's tabulating machine installed at the Census Bureau.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/herman-holleriths-tabulating-machine-2504989/
December 9, 2025 at 5:43 PM
@screwlisp
I just started to watch this:
What Happened to Gopher? The Internet We Lost
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Flo9kn_nhbg
December 9, 2025 at 4:41 AM
RE: https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/115685025377879307

@AmenZwa
Heh. "as the ground effect era comes to a close."
mastodon.social
December 8, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
Fourier transform of a flat line
Suppose you have a constant function _f_(_x_) = _c_. What is the Fourier transform of _f_? We will show why the direct approach doesn’t work, give two hand-wavy approaches, and a rigorous definition. ## Direct approach Unfortunately there are multiple conventions for defining the Fourier transform. For this post, we will define the Fourier transform of a function _f_ to be If _f_(_x_) = _c_ then the integral diverges unless _c_ = 0. ## Heuristic approach The more concentrated a function is in the time domain, the more it spreads out in the frequency domain. And the more spread out a function is in the time domain, the more concentrated it is in the frequency domain. If you think this sounds like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, you’re right: there is a connection. A constant function is as spread out as possible, so it seems that its Fourier transform should be as concentrated as possible, i.e. a delta function. The delta function isn’t literally a function, but it can be made rigorous. More on that below. ## Gaussian density approach The Fourier transform of the Gaussian function exp(− _x_ ²/2) is the same function, i.e. the Gaussian function is a fixed point of the Fourier transform. More generally, the Fourier transform of the density function for a normal random variable with standard deviation σ is the density function for a normal random variable with standard deviation 1/σ. As σ gets larger, the density becomes flatter. So we could think of our function _f_(_x_) = _c_ as some multiple of a Gaussian density in the limit as σ goes to infinity. The Fourier transform is then some multiple of a Gaussian density with σ = 0, i.e. a point mass or delta function. ## Rigorous approach If _f_ and φ are two well-behaved functions then In other words, we can move the “hat” representing the Fourier transform from one function to the other. The equation above is a theorem when _f_ and φ are nice functions. We can use it to motivate a definition when the function _f_ is not so nice but the function φ is very nice. Specifically, we will assume φ is an infinitely differentiable function that goes to zero at infinity faster than any polynomial. Given a Lebesgue integrable function _f_ , we can think of _f_ as a linear operator via the map More generally, we can define a _distribution_ to be any continuous [1] linear operator from the space of test functions to the complex numbers. A distribution that can be defined by integral as above is called a _regular_ distribution. When we say we’re taking the Fourier transform of the constant function _f_(_x_) = _c_ , we’re actually taking the Fourier transform of the regular distribution associated with _f_. [2] Not all distributions are regular. The delta “function” δ(_x_) is a distribution that acts on test functions by evaluating them at 0. We define the Fourier transform of (the regular distribution associated with) a function _f_ to be the distribution whose action on a test function φ equals the integral of the product of _f_ and the Fourier transform of φ. When a function is Lebesgue integrable, this definition matches the classical definition. With this definition, we can calculate that the Fourier transform of a constant function _c_ equals Note that with a different convention for defining the Fourier transform, you might get 2π c δ or just c δ. An advantage of the convention that we’re using is that the Fourier transform of the Fourier transform of _f_(_x_) is _f_(− _x_) and not some multiple of _f_(− _x_). This implies that the Fourier transform of √2π δ is 1 and so the Fourier transform of δ is 1/√2π. ## Related posts * How to differentiate a non-differentiable function * Two meanings of distribution * The Dirac comb (Sha) function * Bessel series for a constant [1] To define continuity we need to put a topology on the space of test functions. That’s too much for this post. [2] The constant function doesn’t have a finite integral, but its product with a test function does because test functions decay rapidly. In fact, even the product of a polynomial with a test function is integrable
www.johndcook.com
December 8, 2025 at 1:42 PM
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@johndcook/115683993950541395

@AmenZwa
If you're rusty, Cook gives a capsule review (he doesn't phrase it that way, but I can't imagine someone absorbing the subject for the first time from a quick abbreviated article).

He also links a previous article, which itself […]
December 8, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
*It worked great for the data set it was given
December 8, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Reposted by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄)
OTD 1962: Inauguration of the Manchester/Ferranti Atlas supercomputer. First with virtual memory!

https://museucapixaba.com.br/hoje/computador-ferranti-atlas-de-1962/
museucapixaba.com.br
December 7, 2025 at 5:38 PM
An old familiar topic:

"Printing Doubles: the Most Difficult Problem in Computer Science" 2023
https://vitaut.net/posts/2023/printing-double/
Printing double aka the most difficult problem in computer science
vitaut.net
December 6, 2025 at 7:14 PM
@AmenZwa
Interesting video about traffic light controllers, showing the modern electronics by Siemens and others that implements the policies on site. Last time I checked into the subject was many years ago, so this was a good update for me.
https://youtu.be/R_2qUW4h6NM
December 6, 2025 at 5:56 PM
@demofox
I was just looking at the Siggraph 2023 paper on Gaussian Splatting again. Way cool. No wonder I keep seeing mumblings about it.

I remember when motion blur in 3d stills was the next big thing on the cover of Siggraph Proceedings.
December 6, 2025 at 4:11 AM
@AmenZwa
BTW don't miss my post about my bizarre LLM experience:
https://mathstodon.xyz/@dougmerritt/115669925174416556
In recent months I've fiddled with LLMs, out of Fear Of Missing Out, and had a peculiar experience I haven't seen anyone else mention.

I rather idly gave Copilot instructions to do a big coding project a step at a time, and kept giving it update instructions for next steps without checking on […]
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
mathstodon.xyz
December 6, 2025 at 1:05 AM
In recent months I've fiddled with LLMs, out of Fear Of Missing Out, and had a peculiar experience I haven't seen anyone else mention.

I rather idly gave Copilot instructions to do a big coding project a step at a time, and kept giving it update instructions for next steps without checking on […]
Original post on mathstodon.xyz
mathstodon.xyz
December 6, 2025 at 1:03 AM