@doctimcook.bsky.social
Reposted
5 years ago I complained that w HAVL “I can see but I can’t get the tube in”.
@doctimcook.bsky.social pointed out “that’s a prob w the operator, not the device”.
Having since learned HAVL I’ve used it routinely for 5 years w 100% FPS & never
![]()
@doctimcook.bsky.social pointed out “that’s a prob w the operator, not the device”.
Having since learned HAVL I’ve used it routinely for 5 years w 100% FPS & never
March 28, 2025 at 10:03 PM
5 years ago I complained that w HAVL “I can see but I can’t get the tube in”.
@doctimcook.bsky.social pointed out “that’s a prob w the operator, not the device”.
Having since learned HAVL I’ve used it routinely for 5 years w 100% FPS & never
@doctimcook.bsky.social pointed out “that’s a prob w the operator, not the device”.
Having since learned HAVL I’ve used it routinely for 5 years w 100% FPS & never
Reposted
I agree
Even as someone who had previously worked in the NHS, I found the new roles, titles and acronyms confusing at first
which prompted me to get a #HelloMyNameIs badge!
Roles should be
a) clearly visible
b) clearly stated
Even as someone who had previously worked in the NHS, I found the new roles, titles and acronyms confusing at first
which prompted me to get a #HelloMyNameIs badge!
Roles should be
a) clearly visible
b) clearly stated
March 28, 2025 at 3:15 PM
I agree
Even as someone who had previously worked in the NHS, I found the new roles, titles and acronyms confusing at first
which prompted me to get a #HelloMyNameIs badge!
Roles should be
a) clearly visible
b) clearly stated
Even as someone who had previously worked in the NHS, I found the new roles, titles and acronyms confusing at first
which prompted me to get a #HelloMyNameIs badge!
Roles should be
a) clearly visible
b) clearly stated
It’s clearly described in the paper….
January 9, 2025 at 9:15 AM
It’s clearly described in the paper….
Glad that your only regret…..you’re a lucky man
January 8, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Glad that your only regret…..you’re a lucky man
Reposted
Tube removal (+ FM/SGA ventilation) is the default action to exclude OI, not only if OI can't be excluded with FB. Tube removal + vent also necessary if desat occurs or sustained exhaled CO2 can't be restored (even if removing tube dangerous or OI apparently excluded w alternative technique).
January 8, 2025 at 8:34 AM
Tube removal (+ FM/SGA ventilation) is the default action to exclude OI, not only if OI can't be excluded with FB. Tube removal + vent also necessary if desat occurs or sustained exhaled CO2 can't be restored (even if removing tube dangerous or OI apparently excluded w alternative technique).
I would alter “Assume no sustained exhaled CO2 = OI unless proven otherwise (by repeat VL/FOB/US/ODD)”
to
“Assume no sustained exhaled CO2 = OI. Remove tube inks unsafe. If unsafe exclude OI (by repeat VL/ & one of FOB/US/ODD)”
Current wording misrepresents the guideline.
to
“Assume no sustained exhaled CO2 = OI. Remove tube inks unsafe. If unsafe exclude OI (by repeat VL/ & one of FOB/US/ODD)”
Current wording misrepresents the guideline.
January 8, 2025 at 4:49 PM
I would alter “Assume no sustained exhaled CO2 = OI unless proven otherwise (by repeat VL/FOB/US/ODD)”
to
“Assume no sustained exhaled CO2 = OI. Remove tube inks unsafe. If unsafe exclude OI (by repeat VL/ & one of FOB/US/ODD)”
Current wording misrepresents the guideline.
to
“Assume no sustained exhaled CO2 = OI. Remove tube inks unsafe. If unsafe exclude OI (by repeat VL/ & one of FOB/US/ODD)”
Current wording misrepresents the guideline.
I would change “Assume no sustained exhaled CO2” to
“Assume lack of sustained exhaled CO2” (or “failure to meet the criteria for….”) to avoid any possibly of conflating with “NO trace”
(Gestalt notwithstanding!)
“Assume lack of sustained exhaled CO2” (or “failure to meet the criteria for….”) to avoid any possibly of conflating with “NO trace”
(Gestalt notwithstanding!)
January 8, 2025 at 4:46 PM
I would change “Assume no sustained exhaled CO2” to
“Assume lack of sustained exhaled CO2” (or “failure to meet the criteria for….”) to avoid any possibly of conflating with “NO trace”
(Gestalt notwithstanding!)
“Assume lack of sustained exhaled CO2” (or “failure to meet the criteria for….”) to avoid any possibly of conflating with “NO trace”
(Gestalt notwithstanding!)
English
300
Connect Bluesky
Enter your Bluesky handle and app password to unlock posting, likes, and your Following feed.
Need an app password? Open Bluesky, go to Settings > App passwords, and create a new one.
Connect with Bluesky
Sign in with your Bluesky account to unlock posting, likes, and your Following feed.