To help Honest Bob Jenrick - whose video completely misrepresents the cab rank rule and the duties on barristers not to discriminate against politically unpopular clients - here’s something from last year. thesecretbarrister.com/2024/03/24/i...

Trump is there to soften up Putin for a deal where Trump gets the Americas up to Greenland and Putin gets what he wants in Eastern Europe. Dividing the planet into larger spheres of power.

I wonder whether Labour thinks there has to be a level of performative politics before a fuller strategy/ discussion on immigration can take over? “Let’s show we can be tough, before we hit them with safe routes and agreed numbers of refugees”

Wow! Thank you. That’s a low percentage.

I’m a bit confused. I would imagine that most women change their passports to their married name if they take their husbands name and have registered for voting purposes with that name? If not, then they can use their birth name?

Is this a pledge for the funding or an actual commitment? You know like 40 new hospitals type pledge? If so, let’s hope he does the homework before the money is spent.

But why is this the government stance? What stops them from seeking a closer relationship with the EU? I don’t understand. It’s like there’s a part to this we are not seeing.

Agreed. Why is that? What’s the reason for not pursuing the opportunities with the EU?

I don’t understand the govt position on this. What’s the obstacle? Why hold back? It’s like there something in the bigger picture we are not seeing.