Reminds me a little of Tony Abbott's example but Abbott still thought it was a bad thing that happened.
Trump though is, at best, morally neutral about it. Morally vacuous is probably the best description.
Reminds me a little of Tony Abbott's example but Abbott still thought it was a bad thing that happened.
Trump though is, at best, morally neutral about it. Morally vacuous is probably the best description.
But I am familiar with attacks upon the person making an argument rather than producing a counter-argument that relies on some form of evidence.
But I am familiar with attacks upon the person making an argument rather than producing a counter-argument that relies on some form of evidence.
No he didn't. This is about power and its abuse, not psychological disturbance.
No he didn't. This is about power and its abuse, not psychological disturbance.