It'd mostly be an expansion on the points in my first response. Milbank has been telling these narratives for decades, but hasn't responded to the very compelling counter-arguments from folks like Stout and Dumler-Winckler. His liberalism is a thin, strawmanned concept.

The narrative can't withstand certain counter-arguments. E.g. Jeff Stout's *Democracy and Tradition* and Emily Dumler-Winckler's *Modern Virtue*.

Many appealing elements here, friend. But the totalizing, flat-ironed description of "liberalism" is frustrating at best. So much more complexity to the historical and conceptual history of modernity that is conveniently elided from the postliberal narrative.

"Is this way of life alive enough to be shared?"

Brilliant stuff here.

I used BlueArk to import my tweets over while I gave this a try.

https://www.plough.com/en/topics/justice/politics/is-tolerance-still-a-virtue

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/renewing-mind-and-heart-tickets-849513496737

https://christianscholars.com/mind-and-heart-addressing-the-crisis-of-formation-in-christian-higher-education/