Why isn’t there ever a candidate for this role that aligns with our expectations? What appears like a progressive appointment on one level then falls down on another. Is the IOC simply too entangled in politics to expect more?

Is this recorded Steve as I’d like to catch up with the discussion if possible?

So to rely on a report that avoids delving into freedom of association and assembly, LGBTQI+ discrimination, the prohibition of trade unions, the right to freedom of religion and forced evictions…. And *still* be judged as a medium risk!

FIFA bid reviewers gave Saudis “highest ever evaluation score ever (TM)” even when:
*entire host cities remain unbuilt
*the stadiums remain (one literally) pie in the sky
*the obvious risk to life and safety of those constructing FIFA World Cup infrastructure
*No idea when it will be played

On human rights, much seems to be gleaned from the Clifford Chance Saudi arm’s “independent context assessment”, which excluded key treaties and avoided sensitive issues. These exclusions were with FIFA’s agreement, according to the report.

www.nytimes.com/athletic/595...