Yea but that was true in 2021 as well. The instruct models were useful.

I fucking love cubes

Is the irony between the first and second paragraphs not screaming at him?

Its been so long since I've heard a politician whole-heartedly defend immigration.

It's like getting a massage after years. Such a relief.

Product Name Driven Ontology

God bless the Chinese labs

It's what a normie who doesn't know anti-fascists or groypers would think they would say, in a "hello fellow kids" kinda way.

Irony poisoned shit posts are hard to explain to people who haven't been exposed. The anti-fascist reference is actually a pro-fascist joke.

Far from proof of course, but it's far from what a lefty would normally meme.

Yeah it wouldn't shock me, but I would hope the eventually success of AT and federation is overdetermined, not fragile.

It's a flaw in the whole concept if some idiots brigading can stop it.

Wait so the AT protocol won't be picked up because a pretty tame case of brigading happened to one of the guys that scraped the feed ages ago?

I don't think the twitter guys are needed. Sad if it is true though.

The mental gymnastics are something to behold. Anything but to actually engage with the accounts or journalism. Still no answer for what would be proof.

Keep dismissing it all as lies

1. Substack. You clearly didn't read it as has been pointed out.

2. Do you see how stupid you sound? I referenced direct accounts of detainees, and you tried to dismiss the concept of 'direct accounts' as proof in the abstract. Just adamant refusal to actually look into anything.

I haven't followed federation stuff recently, why is it never going to happen?

You literally just dismissed a source without reading it. It's you doing lazy headline politics.

If witnesses, journalists and direct accounts aren't proof for you, what is? Are you expecting a curated dataset already, or ICE themselves to admit it?

I meant across your recent posts people give examples and suddenly you stop, not just here. You lazily reject every source that challenges your assumption, when one search would bring up plenty of examples.

It's personification of incurious, lazy, vibe-based politics.

I like how you repeatedly ask for examples, get given them, then go silent. All you can ask is 'do you really think?' or 'you're insane', because you've never actually looked into any of this before and have no interest in absorbing any of it.