Gino
banner
debunker13.ca
Gino
@debunker13.ca
Lifelong learner who believes in challenging assumptions and beliefs. Discomfort = growth. Won’t block you, will push back; expect the same from you.
"List blocking" means 550K+ people subscribed to a list to avoid your content. That's not better, it's worse.
Many have curated you as "persona non grata"; it's consequence, not persecution.
Being catalogued as "not worth engaging" isn't a badge of honour.
Goodnight you two.
November 27, 2025 at 1:28 AM
25th anyone? But good luck getting anyone in admin47 or @jd-vance-1.bsky.social to do anything though...would require leadership.
November 27, 2025 at 1:21 AM
'Politely agree to disagree' requires good faith. You:
- Made claims, no evidence
- Cited fired prosecutor who advised terrorists
- Dismissed sources as 'Cabal'
- Won't specify your own credentials
- Retreat when questioned

That's not disagreement...Its evasion!

This is why 550K+ blocked you.
November 26, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Then ask Grok, because words matter, context matters and source matters. This bad faith is EXACTLY why 550K+ people have blocked you. Not because they want to avoid an echo chamber, but because this level of intellectual dishonesty is frankly disheartening and draining. You're right, we're done.
November 26, 2025 at 9:16 PM
So your claim to a masters degree was just bullshit. Where's your alma mater? DIscusing disagreements in good faith is one thing, this is something else.
November 26, 2025 at 9:15 PM
You made a claim and can't back them up. Now you're backpedalling trying to save face. Whose the sophist now? Sophist tactics:
Claims without evidence.
Cite false authorities
Deflect questions as attacks
Retreat whilst claiming victory
Use rhetoric over substance
November 26, 2025 at 9:14 PM
"Credentials don't matter, thinking process does" → Then why mention YOUR masters? Why cite KrisAnne Hall? You're backgtracking, credentials mean something, mine show I can think and reason, and come to logical conclusions.
November 26, 2025 at 9:14 PM
"You missed my point about credentials" → You attacked mine as 'ivory tower indoctrination' before knowing they're from Rome. That wasn't principled anti-credentialism, that was ignorant dismissal.
November 26, 2025 at 9:14 PM
The SPLC documents her as an antigovernment activist who served as legal adviser to groups including Oath Keepers and worked with Matt Shea…a former legislator found to have ‘participated in an act of terrorism against the United States’.

www.splcenter.org/resources/ex...
KrisAnne Hall
KrisAnne Hall is an antigovernment lawyer and activist in Florida who describes herself as a “constitutional attorney.” Hall runs a business called Constitutional Education and Consulting and travels ...
www.splcenter.org
November 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM
KrisAnne Hall? Interesting choice of authority.
Hall was fired as a Florida prosecutor for refusing to stop political activities. WaPo reports most mainstream legal scholars think her views are ‘off-her-rocker wrong’.

www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/...
Meet the woman who spends 260 days a year preaching the Constitution
KrisAnne Hall barnstorms an angry nation, blasting federal overreach of the Constitution.
www.washingtonpost.com
November 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Also my 'ivory tower' credentials:
Mater Ecclesiae isn't US university 'indoctrination.' It's from the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy...attached to the Vatican: specializing in classical philosophy, logic, and Thomistic reasoning.
Care to try that again?
November 26, 2025 at 8:48 PM
"Credential inflation meets credential dismissal": the degree matters enough to mention but not enough to specify.
Translation: "My FSU and Mater Ecclesiae degrees don't count, but YOUR unspecified Master's does...but also doesn't matter...but I'm mentioning it anyway."
LOL! Get real! What field?
November 26, 2025 at 8:29 PM
So are you a legal scholar or an armchair enthusiast? I have a Bachelor of Classical Humanities (FSU) and Bachelor of Philosophy (Mater Ecclesiae). What credentials does Hermione have to interpret constitutional law?
Hermione Granger valued education, evidence, libraries, rigorous study. You value?
November 26, 2025 at 7:23 PM
You both seem to think everything Trump says is law, but the oath itself proves the hierarchy: Constitution 1st, then orders. Orders only carry authority when they conform to constitutional limits. The structure of the oath is the argument, primacy matters. Otherwise you fail country & constitution!
November 26, 2025 at 5:35 AM
The 6 said: remember your constitutional oath. This is key. That oath explicitly prioritises constitutional principles over executive authority. Executive orders only carry legal weight insofar as they conform to constitutional limits. The Constitution constrains the President, not the reverse.
November 26, 2025 at 5:35 AM
I think it's a fundamental misunderstanding of perspective. Trump is President ergo (I think he thinks) he's the embodiment of the Constitution; as a result everything he says/does is legal and 'law'. The sane world knows this is patently false but don't have the balls to stand up to this bully.
November 26, 2025 at 5:35 AM
Facts matter, yes, and words carry weight.
‘SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!’ isn’t legal theory. It’s a threat against named lawmakers. Your screenshots prove my point, not yours.
The question isn’t whether we have biases, it’s whether we’re willing to examine them honestly.
November 26, 2025 at 4:25 AM
551,476 blocks isn’t persecution…it’s feedback. People block bad faith actors who say ‘facts matter’ then celebrate Trump calling for executions. You’re not ‘challenging bubbles’ you’re wasting our time with performative centrism. They’re going to protect their mental health from sophists. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
November 26, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Stick with Linux.
November 26, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Wish there was an edit option. But maybe it's for the best it's not available.
November 26, 2025 at 2:30 AM
Hitler also thought himself a military tactical genius. But after some initial success he got lost in the hubris, disregard for expert advice and poor long-term planning which suggest he was more of an opportunist than a true genius. Same can be said of Trump.
kenbaker.wordpress.com/2024/11/29/h...
HITLER: Genius or Opportunist? Debate
The debate over whether Adolf Hitler was a military genius or an opportunist is complex and multifaceted. Here are arguments for each perspective: 1. Hitler as a Military Genius Visionary Strategic…
kenbaker.wordpress.com
November 26, 2025 at 2:29 AM
I think it’s a fundamental misunderstanding of perspective. Trump is President ergo (I think he thinks) he’s the embodiment of the Constitution; as a result everything he says/does is legal and “law”.

The sane world knows this is patently false but don’t have the balls to stand up to this bully.
November 25, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Note how the narrative has changed since Epstein Tranparency Act was signed? This feels staged. This new story arc, trying to quell the Epstein Narrative. #EpsteinFiles
November 25, 2025 at 8:19 PM
I'm glad this is happening. Transparency about account locations should be standard across all platforms...like Bluesky, Facebook, Reddit, think everywhere! Makes it harder to run "influence operations" when everyone knows you're not from one of the 50 states. BUT I predict VPN usage will explode.
November 25, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Pre inauguration,true but sad to see your country devolve so far.
November 25, 2025 at 2:39 AM