OP says that the utility of a vote lies in the credible threat to withhold it. I don't think (and didn't intend to imply) that a vote means unconditional support. I'm saying it doesn't make sense to condemn people whose condition is not aiding a mass slaughter for choosing to withhold that vote.

He explicitly says there's a difference between taking up arms and indiscriminate killing. "What do you expect them to do, intentionally targeting civilians is something they're forced into!" Is the same justification people use for the IDF bombing apartments.

The best example of my inflated self-image is that I imagine I would look like this in a Sci-Fi universe, all well-fitting, stylish, yet utilitarian leathers and durable cloths.

In reality I'd probably be a space-shlub.

Dianne Feinstein drank one of these and that's why she died, Big Celsius is covering it up. Stay woke.