They appear to be pretty intuitive. Some colleagues were recently starting to hop onto the distributed quantum computing language, and the terms teledata and telegate stuck pretty soon!
April 11, 2025 at 8:23 AM
They appear to be pretty intuitive. Some colleagues were recently starting to hop onto the distributed quantum computing language, and the terms teledata and telegate stuck pretty soon!
Reposted by Guille DC
Consider this a warning. Factoring small numbers is a bad benchmark. Because the key to factoring small numbers isn’t making the quantum computer "work well". That’s the key to factoring *large* numbers. For small numbers it's sufficient to generate a far-too-large circuit, and light the fuse.
April 1, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Consider this a warning. Factoring small numbers is a bad benchmark. Because the key to factoring small numbers isn’t making the quantum computer "work well". That’s the key to factoring *large* numbers. For small numbers it's sufficient to generate a far-too-large circuit, and light the fuse.
Reposted by Guille DC
Googles claim that their result "lends credence to the notion that quantum computation occurs in many parallel universes" is nonsense, because their results are perfectly well explained by quantum mechanics independent of how you interpret it.
4/5
4/5
December 12, 2024 at 3:49 PM
Googles claim that their result "lends credence to the notion that quantum computation occurs in many parallel universes" is nonsense, because their results are perfectly well explained by quantum mechanics independent of how you interpret it.
4/5
4/5