Reposted by 🫧 Dee 🫧
I would not want to be responsible for delivering a Class 3 Biohazard to a vulnerable patient, or anyone else for that matter.
When you've seen the carnage in ICU and now the Long Cövid catastrophe?
You cannot unsee this shit.
When you've seen the carnage in ICU and now the Long Cövid catastrophe?
You cannot unsee this shit.
January 9, 2025 at 5:42 PM
I would not want to be responsible for delivering a Class 3 Biohazard to a vulnerable patient, or anyone else for that matter.
When you've seen the carnage in ICU and now the Long Cövid catastrophe?
You cannot unsee this shit.
When you've seen the carnage in ICU and now the Long Cövid catastrophe?
You cannot unsee this shit.
They need to aknowledge airborne nature of Covid and the changes it entails.
November 27, 2024 at 8:17 PM
They need to aknowledge airborne nature of Covid and the changes it entails.
You forgot MERS and SARS 1 there. :)
November 24, 2024 at 6:29 PM
You forgot MERS and SARS 1 there. :)
So you think statistic Canada is not a good source and and your source is The Guardian? Again. I think I got.
November 24, 2024 at 6:26 PM
So you think statistic Canada is not a good source and and your source is The Guardian? Again. I think I got.
I think you have answered. There is no evidence to your claims. Thank you. No need to engage anymore.
November 24, 2024 at 6:16 PM
I think you have answered. There is no evidence to your claims. Thank you. No need to engage anymore.
I am asking for evidence to your claim that risk of long Covid is low. Two papers you provided as evidence do not answer your claim. One is from 2016 and one is on use of NSAID during Covid infection. I am guessing there is none.
November 24, 2024 at 6:11 PM
I am asking for evidence to your claim that risk of long Covid is low. Two papers you provided as evidence do not answer your claim. One is from 2016 and one is on use of NSAID during Covid infection. I am guessing there is none.
Here is another one:
“The study, which followed 5367 children, found that 20% of kids (ages 6-11) and 14% of teens met researchers' threshold for long COVID. “
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
“The study, which followed 5367 children, found that 20% of kids (ages 6-11) and 14% of teens met researchers' threshold for long COVID. “
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
Characterizing Long COVID in Children and Adolescents
This observational cohort study examines the symptoms experienced by children after SARS-CoV-2 infection and how these symptoms differ by age (6-11 years vs 12-17 years).
jamanetwork.com
November 24, 2024 at 6:03 PM
Here is another one:
“The study, which followed 5367 children, found that 20% of kids (ages 6-11) and 14% of teens met researchers' threshold for long COVID. “
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
“The study, which followed 5367 children, found that 20% of kids (ages 6-11) and 14% of teens met researchers' threshold for long COVID. “
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
You still haven’t shown any evidence to your claim that risk of long Covid is very low and statistics Canada is apparently not good enough
What about this?
“Our estimated prevalence of PASC was 22.8%, which is close to the national estimates for the region.”
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
What about this?
“Our estimated prevalence of PASC was 22.8%, which is close to the national estimates for the region.”
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Precision phenotyping for curating research cohorts of patients with unexplained post-acute sequelae of COVID-19
Scalable identification of patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is challenging due to a lack of reproducible precision phenotyping alg…
www.sciencedirect.com
November 24, 2024 at 5:58 PM
You still haven’t shown any evidence to your claim that risk of long Covid is very low and statistics Canada is apparently not good enough
What about this?
“Our estimated prevalence of PASC was 22.8%, which is close to the national estimates for the region.”
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
What about this?
“Our estimated prevalence of PASC was 22.8%, which is close to the national estimates for the region.”
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Have you read the paper I sent you from Statistics Canada showing 37% risk of Long Covid after 3rd infection ?
November 24, 2024 at 5:48 PM
Have you read the paper I sent you from Statistics Canada showing 37% risk of Long Covid after 3rd infection ?
www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-00...
Here is the full paper on risk of long Covid being 37% after 3rd infection
Here is the full paper on risk of long Covid being 37% after 3rd infection
Experiences of Canadians with long-term symptoms following COVID-19
This study uses data from the Canadian COVID-19 Antibody and Health Survey to describe the current COVID-19 landscape, including infection, reinfection, and acute and long-term symptoms. This study al...
www150.statcan.gc.ca
November 24, 2024 at 5:44 PM
www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-00...
Here is the full paper on risk of long Covid being 37% after 3rd infection
Here is the full paper on risk of long Covid being 37% after 3rd infection
You just gave me a paper from 2016 before there was even the term long Covid. Thank you.
The risk of long Covid is almost 40% after three infections.
The risk of long Covid is almost 40% after three infections.
November 24, 2024 at 5:06 PM
You just gave me a paper from 2016 before there was even the term long Covid. Thank you.
The risk of long Covid is almost 40% after three infections.
The risk of long Covid is almost 40% after three infections.
I am guessing by the answer that you cannot back up your claim that the risk of long Covid is very low. Thank you. Thats all I wanted to know.
November 24, 2024 at 4:49 PM
I am guessing by the answer that you cannot back up your claim that the risk of long Covid is very low. Thank you. Thats all I wanted to know.
Can you explain “the risk is very low” for developing long Covid? What is that risk? And where can I find a paper on that? What I see is cumulative damage and increasing risk with each infection. This is contradicting what I have seen stated by WHO, CDC, and Health Canada among many others.
November 24, 2024 at 3:47 AM
Can you explain “the risk is very low” for developing long Covid? What is that risk? And where can I find a paper on that? What I see is cumulative damage and increasing risk with each infection. This is contradicting what I have seen stated by WHO, CDC, and Health Canada among many others.
Are you ignoring long Covid, organ damage, cumulative damage, viral persistence, autoimmunity, etc etc?
November 24, 2024 at 3:34 AM
Are you ignoring long Covid, organ damage, cumulative damage, viral persistence, autoimmunity, etc etc?