What I meant was, someone prone to destroying his OS would probably be less likely to do any real damage using an immutable OS where he can't really change anything outside his personal files.
But that doesn't mean he should use it if he doesn't want to.
What I meant was, someone prone to destroying his OS would probably be less likely to do any real damage using an immutable OS where he can't really change anything outside his personal files.
But that doesn't mean he should use it if he doesn't want to.
However, when I switched my in-laws to Linux, that was not the case. They were having lots of problems, and they don't have them now.
However, when I switched my in-laws to Linux, that was not the case. They were having lots of problems, and they don't have them now.
Anyway, I know I'm being the kind of person described on the OP, but your dad would probably be much better off using an immutable Linux distro like Fedora Silverblue than he is using Windows.
Anyway, I know I'm being the kind of person described on the OP, but your dad would probably be much better off using an immutable Linux distro like Fedora Silverblue than he is using Windows.
How was he barely able to use the computer? Did he have problems finding the Start menu? Closing programs after using them? Restoring minimized windows?
How was he barely able to use the computer? Did he have problems finding the Start menu? Closing programs after using them? Restoring minimized windows?