David Faith
@davidfides.bsky.social
Geeky lawyer, lefty dad, smarty pants.
The fact it's asking what they want *more of* seems like it might be important.
June 17, 2025 at 4:05 PM
The fact it's asking what they want *more of* seems like it might be important.
Reposted by David Faith
There is zero legal basis to make that pronouncement. None at all. There is no moral basis to say anything of the sort. This is utterly reprehensible.
April 22, 2025 at 12:55 PM
There is zero legal basis to make that pronouncement. None at all. There is no moral basis to say anything of the sort. This is utterly reprehensible.
You could be a dick by mistake but to be a prick requires intention.
April 20, 2025 at 9:16 PM
You could be a dick by mistake but to be a prick requires intention.
Don't forget Bobby Crunches! Invented squats.
April 19, 2025 at 7:47 AM
Don't forget Bobby Crunches! Invented squats.
Not an HR lawyer either but my first thought was a case to ECtHR on the basis the GRA has been undermined to such an extent that the Art 8 violations recognised in Goodwin have been reestablished.
April 17, 2025 at 9:43 AM
Not an HR lawyer either but my first thought was a case to ECtHR on the basis the GRA has been undermined to such an extent that the Art 8 violations recognised in Goodwin have been reestablished.