That's the tradition. All the constitution says is that they "shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support the Constitution"

What you're referring to is the tradition. In rare occasions judges or other officials have sworn reps in.

So let's have Jackson, Sotomayor or Kagan do it.

This is a good article, but these few paragraphs are key.

Do you think the admin would take all of these extrajudicial steps, consolidating power etc if they planned on holding free & fair elections?

Would they stand for Dems taking these actions?

Then that's the answer to the previous question.

Ha.. yeah..

We are fucked

And our glorious leaders plan to address this major economic indicator??

Fire the guys who ran the numbers...

Yeah, that seems right on schedule...

Perfect. I definitely want my 14-year-old working an overnight shift before going to school and taking his algebra exam. That's exactly what we need.

We are in the worst timeline.

I've been screaming this from the top of my lungs for the past 12 years. So many under informed voters have no idea how much of their life is supplemented by the federal bureaucracy.

We are watching, in real time, a kid putting a stick in his bike spokes as he's riding along the street.

We are so painfully unserious as a country...

for a long time. It's a tough topic that takes a willingness to challenge our preconceived notions and even those really smart people have failed too push the needle.

It's been a discouraging couple of decades.

This quote from Carl Sagan always haunts me.