Hmm, describing fellow human beings as worthless and scum suggests my use of fellow was inaccurate in your case. I thought Scots were supposed to be better than that, or is that just another "exceptionalist" claim proven wrong?

That's a very bleak, cynical and negative outlook. I might say fucking crazy too.

Without a single redeeming factor?

Why would FC attract that from Americans?

I'm not sure how being as hateful as you say she is helps, or makes such behaviour any better than hers.

So if I say “billionaires should not have this much money,” I’m declaring Class War but if the billionaires say I should be replaced by robots, that’s just good business?

"Not everyone is welcome" would definitely be ok with them.

It's always helpful when someone feels comfortable describing a person as more of an underboiled ham than he'd ever imagined. I mean what sort of person imagines someone they've never seen as any sort of underboiled ham? Cockwomble is such a useful word, don't you think?

There is a band, it's called Squeeze 🤔

First time for everything. Oh, I thought you said Trump did tell the truth 😉

Completely different scenario. Unless you know of a grocery store which charges one price no matter how many goods you take

I have a recipe for leftover wine which I have never ever had the need for 🤔

Without more information It's hard to see the scaremongering. Or snobbery.

30p Lee might agree 🤔

I'm slightly confused. There are an awful lot of pretty objectional people featured in the podcast who nevertheless produced important work. Should we now refuse to buy, for example, anything by the Stones because of their multitude of misogynistic songs?