Thes best one is "self-motivated". Translation: your working conditions are between pure slavery and kids mining diamonds, so you won't find any external motivation.

Many journals and funders have very strict guidelines forbidding the use of LLM in peer review. This is something @davalamo.bsky.social discuss often with students and postdocs: it is a blatant mishandling of privileged information (aka someone else's manuscript)

Only two types of evidence for them: evidence in their favor o evidence manipulated by big-pharma.

No amount of information will change the mind of someone who thinks there is a conspiracy involving uber-rich people and pharma companies to reduce human population through vaccines

Agree, but I would add: get someone WHO KNOWS YOU WELL to write a great recommendation letter.

Nowadays, I find it increasingly difficult to distinguish types 1 and 2.

Are you implying Trump won’t care? Make America great again does not apply to the Southern part of it?_

Interactions between adipose tissue and muscle cells are critical for the development of a good jamón ibérico.

In line with 2, I would add 5: one can plan to make history (really disruptive/paradigm shifting discoveries are unpredictable)

Well, if it’s only 1400 papers…