Further in the context of this thread on Liz Truss it's even more ambiguous what she is talking about.
Further in the context of this thread on Liz Truss it's even more ambiguous what she is talking about.
Which leading statutes, conventions, judicial decisions and treaties are part of it and which aren't?
Which leading statutes, conventions, judicial decisions and treaties are part of it and which aren't?
Perhaps it would be better to say we are relatively close to absolutely having a constitution. Or is that too Yes Minister.
Perhaps it would be better to say we are relatively close to absolutely having a constitution. Or is that too Yes Minister.