But also, why is a book that makes this kind of lazy, bad-faith argumentation getting any accolades at all?
But also, why is a book that makes this kind of lazy, bad-faith argumentation getting any accolades at all?
(1) they require a permanent underclass to do all the labor that keeps cities functional,
(2) they have no answers to how or why free people en masse would sign up to be that permanent underclass
And
(3) that’s because they want slaves.
(1) they require a permanent underclass to do all the labor that keeps cities functional,
(2) they have no answers to how or why free people en masse would sign up to be that permanent underclass
And
(3) that’s because they want slaves.