Makes you wonder how long until the US rail industry realizes it has the opposite problem

just hanging out in NASA Aero like

When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail

all i can think right now is "yeah okay, sure"

Still trying to figure which one of the guys at my office drives the geo metro in

Unfortunately

Our only comfort at this point is nihilism

In her intro email she said been signing off by it since becoming KSC in 2021 director as a “reminder to lean into things that are new and stretching, because when we shy away from things that challenge us, we rob ourselves of the opportunity to grow”

Have you embraced the challenge yet

A key part of the review process is taking your thoughts and deciding which of them are important critiques as opposed to thoughts you had that may have been addressed later. I don't know why you would try to automate this process given it is a *decision you are making*

No. Never.

I review 20+ of papers a year—it's my job as a scientist. The public pays my salary and trust me to use my time wisely to advance science. Through peer review, I do exactly that. I spend two or three weeks a year reviewing, but I’ve never wasted a day reviewing a paper, and never will.

The main contribution of LLMs at the moment seems to be increasing burdens on roles where critical thought is important (grading, paper and grant review, etc) by removing gates that previously required actual thinking to pass through