Daniel Graeber
@dangraeber.bsky.social
economist | 1st-gen uni grad | post-doc @DIW, SOEP | affiliated with @iza_bonn & @cepa_unipotsdam | opinions are my own | pic (c): DIW/Photothek
HP: http://dangraeber.github.io/academic_site
HP: http://dangraeber.github.io/academic_site
And this is also a good one. But leaning towards market design.
July 5, 2025 at 6:50 PM
And this is also a good one. But leaning towards market design.
This is also a nice one. Very much in the same spirit like the one by Ansgar.
July 5, 2025 at 6:48 PM
This is also a nice one. Very much in the same spirit like the one by Ansgar.
I loved this book. It is relatively accessable. Emphasis on relatively.
July 5, 2025 at 6:45 PM
I loved this book. It is relatively accessable. Emphasis on relatively.
Appeal! I think this smoking gun evidence of oversight. Every editor should be happy if they are pointed towards what is nothing else than an error.
Until the uncertainty unravels, I hope you find the strength to move through this!
Until the uncertainty unravels, I hope you find the strength to move through this!
May 19, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Appeal! I think this smoking gun evidence of oversight. Every editor should be happy if they are pointed towards what is nothing else than an error.
Until the uncertainty unravels, I hope you find the strength to move through this!
Until the uncertainty unravels, I hope you find the strength to move through this!