Read the full op-ed here: dangerousspeech.org/op-ed-israel...

What’s happening is tantamount to torturing civilians. Israel – and the United States – must act to relieve needless suffering and death.

But fighting will only stop when both sides agree to it, or Hamas is crushed, and neither is likely soon. Meanwhile, nearly two million people are enduring tremendous suffering.

The dangerous speech @dangerousspeech.org framework teaches us that when those in authority dog whistle or more explicitly signal certain things, extremists immediately pick it up, amplify, spread, and normalise. Today, a white supremacist man based in NZ railed against DEI in a YouTube video.

We have signed the ACLU’s letter to the House of Representatives with a coalition of other orgs, which you can read here: www.aclu.org/documents/co...

Banning TikTok could have an even more dire impact in an election year: it's a hub for news and information that will be critical to ensuring eligible voters have the right information and are not susceptible to mis- and dis-information. #DontBanTikTok

techpolicy.press/can-ai-rescu...

Around 12 mins 54 secs, the following exchange takes place. Given the media, & political culture in New Zealand, it's an extraordinary invocation of violence, & what The Disinformation Project studies as 'dangerous speech'. @dangerousspeech.org To his credit, interviewee doesn't wholly endorse term.

Follow along as we release our monthly briefs throughout the 2024 U.S. elections: dangerousspeech.org/research/202...

Using expert researchers and #AI software designed to search 20+ unmoderated online platforms, Director of Research Cathy Buerger is leading a novel effort to find and analyze dangerous speech as it emerges, and share the information with counterspeakers and others countering hatred.

As the 2024 U.S. election approaches - alongside dozens of other elections around the world - there is an increasing possibility of intergroup violence, along with increasing dangerous speech.

In the examples above, Republicans are, in essence, accusing Democrats of using this rhetorical technique – claiming that Donald Trump and his supporters are violating people’s rights, when rather, it is Democrats who are doing so.

This is an interesting iteration of the dangerous speech hallmark “accusation in a mirror: attributing to one’s enemies the very acts of violence the speaker hopes to commit against them: dangerousspeech.org/guide/

Follow along as we release our monthly briefs: dangerousspeech.org/research/202...

Using expert researchers and #AI software designed to search 20+ unmoderated online platforms, Director of Research Cathy Buerger is leading a novel effort to find and analyze dangerous speech as it emerges, and share the information with counterspeakers and others countering hatred.