Dana M. Johnson, PhD
banner
danamartha.bsky.social
Dana M. Johnson, PhD
@danamartha.bsky.social
Postdoctoral fellow UW-Madison | I research and write about abortion, contraception, adolescents, and public policy

https://linktr.ee/danamarthaPhD
Reposted by Dana M. Johnson, PhD
Actual text from the 22-23 NSFG User's Guide. They're basically saying DO NOT COMPARE TIME TRENDS ACROSS CYCLES.
September 22, 2025 at 2:42 PM
$1.2 trillion in Medicaid cuts and food stamps

11.8 million Americans uninsured by 2034

This is actually impressively unhinged
July 3, 2025 at 7:59 PM
It is an honor to collaborate with colleagues at @ibisrh.bsky.social @carafem.org @aidaccess.bsky.social
on this research - without these incredibly dedicated researchers and providers - access to any medication abortion regimen would be even more difficult than it is today
June 30, 2025 at 3:43 PM
1) Focuses on patient experiences in the US: Acceptability of misoprostol-only medication abortion dispensed by mail-order or retail pharmacy: a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews in the United States (2/4)

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Acceptability of misoprostol-only medication abortion dispensed by mail-order or retail pharmacy: a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews in the United States
The WHO recommends two medication abortion regimens, either misoprostol used with mifepristone, or misoprostol-only. Both regimens are recognised as safe and effective, but in the United States (US...
www.tandfonline.com
June 30, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Reposted by Dana M. Johnson, PhD
You can read more about the devastating public health impacts of this ruling in this op-ed Terri-Ann Thompson and @danamartha.bsky.social wrote for The Hill in April ➡️ thehill.com/opinion/...
Abortion is back at SCOTUS — and this time the case could destroy Medicaid
The Supreme Court is considering a case that could strip millions of Medicaid recipients of their right to choose their health care provider, potentially allowing states to dictate health care opti…
thehill.com
June 26, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Reposted by Dana M. Johnson, PhD
So, don't be misled by reports that claim SCOTUS "saved" birthright citizenship... they are missing the point. The Court will likely narrow the circumstances under which universal injunctions may issue, thereby hindering lower courts' ability to rein in the administration. A BIG win for POTUS.
June 26, 2025 at 5:20 PM