It's (a) unusual for the judge who grants permission to hear a substantive JR (b) common to have a divisional court for important cases (c) entirely normal not to know which judge will hear a case until the day before. This is not to say English courts could be more transparent about case allocation

This works well for "revisions required" following a PhD viva as well. The omerta around discussing it means very few realise how common it is, how it's not the end of the world, and how it's not going to haunt you for the rest of your life (even if it does mean a few more months of graft).

I saw Michael Gambon do Krapp's Last Tape in the West End a decade or so ago and there were some very confused Harry Potter fans in the audience.

Your reward is somehow more pogoing and more prick birds

100%. Not helped by my just having replayed Hollow Knight in anticipation.

My flatmate did this pre-Spotify. Highlights included this unforgettable gem m.youtube.com/watch?v=sDoR...

Hmm

This would be a good start utppublishing.com/doi/book/10....

For info on the human consequences of past goalpost moving, see righttoremain.org.uk/a-nightmare-...

It might, but I don't think it is likely to succeed because eligibility falls to be assessed at the time you apply for settlement, and by reference to the rules then in force. (This lot aren't the first to have moved the goalposts either).

The doc with the power. What power? The power of the doc. Hudoc? You doc? Doc what? Remind me of the doc.

It was 2001, British High Commission election "night" party.

Can you guarantee it'll be great?

“Now, son of man, take a sharp sword and use it as a barber’s razor" Ezekiel 5:1

You need a good attrib *.* -s -r -h in between the two of those to cause real havoc

Waiting for their turn at the chicken desk.