What about from colleagues or professionals you haven’t met?

Jumping into this conversation in the middle but can you explain more? Abstract thinking, careful definition, breaking a problem into steps, persistence, visualizing complex objects in multiple ways, etc. all seem like important strengths to me.

Is it trained on any existing human peer reviews?

Greater representation of views from across the political spectrum.

I agree, they are trying. You can see this in the hearings. But they have limited tools at their disposal.

Yeah, they really brought something good out of Adam Sandler in that one (not sure if he's had any other strong performances like this)

You're welcome!

Pose: By now you should know which one is Pop by the process of elimination. But in case you missed one of the other two, think of how he poses: as ifin a parade. And a 'pose' is like a role (of a drum core leader). Also "Pop" starts with the same letter as "Parade". So Pop is the parade hat guy.

Clothes: That reminds you what the clue is for Crackle. He wears a piece of clothing known as a cap (and a cap is the same first letter as Crackle, by the way, so there's another clue.)

It doesn't tell you directly which one is Snap, Crackle or Pop, but it gives you the _clues you need_.

Sound: Think of the "snapping" sound, and picture a chef snapping his fingers when a dish is ready. Snap is the chef!

You can also find commended evaluations (similar to top referee reports) at unjournal.pubpub.org/prize-winnin...

Is it equivalent to say “women are rewarded for being solo authors but men are not?”