@customoto13.bsky.social
Well guess there is a time to say fuck the fire department.
January 14, 2026 at 1:37 AM
Well guess there is a time to say fuck the fire department.
Reposted
This is today in Minnesota. A swarm of ICE thugs bashed in the door with guns aimed. Everyone has to watch and share. This is now Sunday in America.
January 11, 2026 at 11:10 PM
This is today in Minnesota. A swarm of ICE thugs bashed in the door with guns aimed. Everyone has to watch and share. This is now Sunday in America.
First is ss could be a bad or old tattoo as the guy claims in the video. May also be an attempt at the scout sniper use of ss.
Second one is questionable as to Nazi link as someone can be a Wodinist and also a POS and not a Neo-Nazi.
Second one is questionable as to Nazi link as someone can be a Wodinist and also a POS and not a Neo-Nazi.
January 11, 2026 at 6:41 PM
First is ss could be a bad or old tattoo as the guy claims in the video. May also be an attempt at the scout sniper use of ss.
Second one is questionable as to Nazi link as someone can be a Wodinist and also a POS and not a Neo-Nazi.
Second one is questionable as to Nazi link as someone can be a Wodinist and also a POS and not a Neo-Nazi.
Yeah I was wrong. It’s been forever since I read the case in school, but the court in Long interprets it as applying to the whole list of actions.
I don’t know if the courts will hold to the prior precedent, and this isn’t legal advice.
I don’t know if the courts will hold to the prior precedent, and this isn’t legal advice.
January 11, 2026 at 4:19 AM
Yeah I was wrong. It’s been forever since I read the case in school, but the court in Long interprets it as applying to the whole list of actions.
I don’t know if the courts will hold to the prior precedent, and this isn’t legal advice.
I don’t know if the courts will hold to the prior precedent, and this isn’t legal advice.
For what it’s worth the case law cited in the thread by others states explicitly that it does apply to all. (Long)
January 11, 2026 at 4:06 AM
For what it’s worth the case law cited in the thread by others states explicitly that it does apply to all. (Long)
Or marbles, and banana peels. lol (iykyk)
January 10, 2026 at 1:30 AM
Or marbles, and banana peels. lol (iykyk)
Both points are demonstrably false from the video.
DOJ/DHS policy indicates the agent acted counter to his training.
What evidence do you have to show he acted within operating procedures?
DOJ/DHS policy indicates the agent acted counter to his training.
What evidence do you have to show he acted within operating procedures?
January 10, 2026 at 1:21 AM
Both points are demonstrably false from the video.
DOJ/DHS policy indicates the agent acted counter to his training.
What evidence do you have to show he acted within operating procedures?
DOJ/DHS policy indicates the agent acted counter to his training.
What evidence do you have to show he acted within operating procedures?
Reposted
The camera angle literally shows her turning away from him
January 9, 2026 at 7:00 PM
The camera angle literally shows her turning away from him
Reposted
Don't forget also a notorious racist who used to do very unfunny impressions of minorities for Fox.
January 8, 2026 at 6:03 AM
Don't forget also a notorious racist who used to do very unfunny impressions of minorities for Fox.
But will cheer on his own police force murdering citizens for no good reason.
In this case TACO is a phenom and nothing he says has a grounding in reality.
In this case TACO is a phenom and nothing he says has a grounding in reality.
January 8, 2026 at 3:13 AM
But will cheer on his own police force murdering citizens for no good reason.
In this case TACO is a phenom and nothing he says has a grounding in reality.
In this case TACO is a phenom and nothing he says has a grounding in reality.
Reposted
1. her wheels were turned away from the nazi
2. Musk is also a nazi
2. Musk is also a nazi
January 7, 2026 at 9:39 PM
1. her wheels were turned away from the nazi
2. Musk is also a nazi
2. Musk is also a nazi
This post contains misinformation and propaganda.
Eyewitness did not report a vehicle ramming. And that is contrary to what was reported and what the video shows. This is the line that the secret federal police are claiming justifies the shooting.
Eyewitness did not report a vehicle ramming. And that is contrary to what was reported and what the video shows. This is the line that the secret federal police are claiming justifies the shooting.
January 7, 2026 at 9:21 PM
This post contains misinformation and propaganda.
Eyewitness did not report a vehicle ramming. And that is contrary to what was reported and what the video shows. This is the line that the secret federal police are claiming justifies the shooting.
Eyewitness did not report a vehicle ramming. And that is contrary to what was reported and what the video shows. This is the line that the secret federal police are claiming justifies the shooting.
The video is clear and unambiguous that the agent was never struck and murdered the driver.
January 7, 2026 at 9:16 PM
The video is clear and unambiguous that the agent was never struck and murdered the driver.
How you expect people to believe the officer was standing in front of a vehicle after being rammed and then was able to murder the driver?
Especially when the video shows the agent was never struck and the woman was trying to drive away.
Especially when the video shows the agent was never struck and the woman was trying to drive away.
January 7, 2026 at 9:15 PM
How you expect people to believe the officer was standing in front of a vehicle after being rammed and then was able to murder the driver?
Especially when the video shows the agent was never struck and the woman was trying to drive away.
Especially when the video shows the agent was never struck and the woman was trying to drive away.
This comment contains misinformation and propaganda.
The driver of the vehicle did not attempt to run over the ICE Agent, and the Agent did not need to murder the woman to protect himself.
The driver of the vehicle did not attempt to run over the ICE Agent, and the Agent did not need to murder the woman to protect himself.
January 7, 2026 at 9:05 PM
This comment contains misinformation and propaganda.
The driver of the vehicle did not attempt to run over the ICE Agent, and the Agent did not need to murder the woman to protect himself.
The driver of the vehicle did not attempt to run over the ICE Agent, and the Agent did not need to murder the woman to protect himself.
The officer was not rammed and could have stepped out of the way
January 7, 2026 at 8:59 PM
The officer was not rammed and could have stepped out of the way