For that 9% an easy way to help is to allow for shared slogans / ballot grouping to reward coalitions.
For that 9% an easy way to help is to allow for shared slogans / ballot grouping to reward coalitions.
9%: "I didn't know enough about the other candidates."
8%: "I was afraid that ranking other candidates would hurt my preferred candidate."
4%: "I didn't know I could rank candidates."
0%: "I didn't understand how to fill out the ballot."
www.surveyusa.com/client/PollR...
9%: "I didn't know enough about the other candidates."
8%: "I was afraid that ranking other candidates would hurt my preferred candidate."
4%: "I didn't know I could rank candidates."
0%: "I didn't understand how to fill out the ballot."
www.surveyusa.com/client/PollR...
Those who only voted for a single candidate were asked why they did so, the overwhelming majority, 87%, said "That was the only candidate I liked," an answer selected by no less than 69% in any demographic group or part of the city.
Those who only voted for a single candidate were asked why they did so, the overwhelming majority, 87%, said "That was the only candidate I liked," an answer selected by no less than 69% in any demographic group or part of the city.
It is impossible to tell the difference looking at raw voting results.
It is impossible to tell the difference looking at raw voting results.
Lots of local NJ elections would use proportional RCV (aka STV), so that mitigates concerns with ballot exhaustion.
And because of the bizarre block voting system we use, we already have issues with bullet voting.
Lots of local NJ elections would use proportional RCV (aka STV), so that mitigates concerns with ballot exhaustion.
And because of the bizarre block voting system we use, we already have issues with bullet voting.