Fair point. Let me clarify: People’s responses to his post were hysterical. I agree; there is no humor in the vitriol Vance spews.

Not disagreeing with you on any of this. However, as of my last post, he hadn’t lied on BlueSky (yet). He asked an entirely legitimate question about an admittedly flawed Supreme Court decision. But it’s an argument we can win on merit so let’s have the argument.

I hope this isn’t true. Not because I plan to follow him. But because the whole point of BlueSky is that if you don’t like something or someone, you can block them. And, as many have pointed out, it’s worth it for the comedy factor. The comments are amazing.

Like a courtesy flush.

I’m not saying that! Let’s just be respectful when we flush.

Too bad he can’t be flushed into the septic tank…

Okay. You get a pass.

You take that back!!! I’m not nearly old enough to be called a boomer!

Agree with this 100%. Let’s not give him the satisfaction.

Yes!!!! That’s the spirit!

Come on. I don’t agree with the guy but he’s asking a respectful question. Honestly, it’s an easy argument to knock down just as respectfully.

Sir, you need to resign. Now.

Sir, you need to resign. Now.

This guy has clearly never actually read Adam Smith.

I think it’s been pretty conclusively proven that Debbie Wasserman Schultz colluded with the Clinton campaign in a way that made it all but impossible for Bernie to win the nomination. So, no. We did not have a fair primary in 2016. Nor did we have one in 2024. Look what happened both times.

Let me know the next time you and Bob come to Topanga! We’ve lived here since our daughter was born in 2017.

We’re going to need a constitutional convention after this.

Was just about to write this but you beat me to it!