Correct Question
@correctquestion.bsky.social
Stop pandering to the extremes: if given a choice of 90% of a loaf or no loaf, they will choose “no loaf” then accuse you of trying to starve them.
Can someone explain how these will get released?
Ok it passes the house. Then needs 60 to pass the senate. Then … has to be signed by Trump?
Even if Trump’s not in the loop: what if DOJ just refuses to release? There’s no one to MAKE them do it …
Ok it passes the house. Then needs 60 to pass the senate. Then … has to be signed by Trump?
Even if Trump’s not in the loop: what if DOJ just refuses to release? There’s no one to MAKE them do it …
November 13, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Can someone explain how these will get released?
Ok it passes the house. Then needs 60 to pass the senate. Then … has to be signed by Trump?
Even if Trump’s not in the loop: what if DOJ just refuses to release? There’s no one to MAKE them do it …
Ok it passes the house. Then needs 60 to pass the senate. Then … has to be signed by Trump?
Even if Trump’s not in the loop: what if DOJ just refuses to release? There’s no one to MAKE them do it …
I agree that Trump is not the 1st to favor the unitary executive theory
Nor do I dispute we’ve been gravitating toward that for decades, including *but not limited to* when Cheney was VP
I maintain Trump 2.0 would still look like it does even if Cheney had never existed bsky.app/profile/corr...
Nor do I dispute we’ve been gravitating toward that for decades, including *but not limited to* when Cheney was VP
I maintain Trump 2.0 would still look like it does even if Cheney had never existed bsky.app/profile/corr...
clearly learned his lesson and would not make that mistake again — surrounding himself with sycophants wholly dependent on HIM
In Trump 2.0, it would not have mattered ONE WIT whether Cheney had been VP or if Joe Lieberman had been VP from 2000-2008. We would still be right where we are now
/end
In Trump 2.0, it would not have mattered ONE WIT whether Cheney had been VP or if Joe Lieberman had been VP from 2000-2008. We would still be right where we are now
/end
November 6, 2025 at 5:04 PM
I agree that Trump is not the 1st to favor the unitary executive theory
Nor do I dispute we’ve been gravitating toward that for decades, including *but not limited to* when Cheney was VP
I maintain Trump 2.0 would still look like it does even if Cheney had never existed bsky.app/profile/corr...
Nor do I dispute we’ve been gravitating toward that for decades, including *but not limited to* when Cheney was VP
I maintain Trump 2.0 would still look like it does even if Cheney had never existed bsky.app/profile/corr...
clearly learned his lesson and would not make that mistake again — surrounding himself with sycophants wholly dependent on HIM
In Trump 2.0, it would not have mattered ONE WIT whether Cheney had been VP or if Joe Lieberman had been VP from 2000-2008. We would still be right where we are now
/end
In Trump 2.0, it would not have mattered ONE WIT whether Cheney had been VP or if Joe Lieberman had been VP from 2000-2008. We would still be right where we are now
/end
November 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM
clearly learned his lesson and would not make that mistake again — surrounding himself with sycophants wholly dependent on HIM
In Trump 2.0, it would not have mattered ONE WIT whether Cheney had been VP or if Joe Lieberman had been VP from 2000-2008. We would still be right where we are now
/end
In Trump 2.0, it would not have mattered ONE WIT whether Cheney had been VP or if Joe Lieberman had been VP from 2000-2008. We would still be right where we are now
/end
… a narcissistic ignoramus, oblivious to laws, norms, the “unitary executive” theory, or any other constraint
What he learned he learned not from Cheney, but rather from Trump 1.0 — where his most sinister impulses were squelched by better men who he had surrounded himself with
He …
2/
What he learned he learned not from Cheney, but rather from Trump 1.0 — where his most sinister impulses were squelched by better men who he had surrounded himself with
He …
2/
November 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM
… a narcissistic ignoramus, oblivious to laws, norms, the “unitary executive” theory, or any other constraint
What he learned he learned not from Cheney, but rather from Trump 1.0 — where his most sinister impulses were squelched by better men who he had surrounded himself with
He …
2/
What he learned he learned not from Cheney, but rather from Trump 1.0 — where his most sinister impulses were squelched by better men who he had surrounded himself with
He …
2/
I think this wildly misses the mark by somehow tracing Trump back to a road paved by Cheney
The premise itself suggests that Trump cares or is even aware of what is allowed, not allowed, etc, and this pushed his way through some crack Cheney opened up
Ridiculous. Trump is ..
1/
The premise itself suggests that Trump cares or is even aware of what is allowed, not allowed, etc, and this pushed his way through some crack Cheney opened up
Ridiculous. Trump is ..
1/
November 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM
I think this wildly misses the mark by somehow tracing Trump back to a road paved by Cheney
The premise itself suggests that Trump cares or is even aware of what is allowed, not allowed, etc, and this pushed his way through some crack Cheney opened up
Ridiculous. Trump is ..
1/
The premise itself suggests that Trump cares or is even aware of what is allowed, not allowed, etc, and this pushed his way through some crack Cheney opened up
Ridiculous. Trump is ..
1/
Reposted by Correct Question
No, I have simply learned that when it comes to controversial topics, asking ppl on one side to *describe* what ppl on the other side are saying is not reliable
“They compared us to David Duke!”
“Jimmy Kimmel blamed Kirk for his own death!”
“The FBI admitted 274 undercover agents on J6!”
Etc
“They compared us to David Duke!”
“Jimmy Kimmel blamed Kirk for his own death!”
“The FBI admitted 274 undercover agents on J6!”
Etc
September 28, 2025 at 2:51 PM
No, I have simply learned that when it comes to controversial topics, asking ppl on one side to *describe* what ppl on the other side are saying is not reliable
“They compared us to David Duke!”
“Jimmy Kimmel blamed Kirk for his own death!”
“The FBI admitted 274 undercover agents on J6!”
Etc
“They compared us to David Duke!”
“Jimmy Kimmel blamed Kirk for his own death!”
“The FBI admitted 274 undercover agents on J6!”
Etc
Beginning and end are accurate
But way off base to say the only thing Trump could “fear” from Cheney was losing the election
Trump is TERRIFIED of looking weak or having others get the best of him. He knew that would happen in a 1:1 with Dick Cheney.
But way off base to say the only thing Trump could “fear” from Cheney was losing the election
Trump is TERRIFIED of looking weak or having others get the best of him. He knew that would happen in a 1:1 with Dick Cheney.
November 4, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Beginning and end are accurate
But way off base to say the only thing Trump could “fear” from Cheney was losing the election
Trump is TERRIFIED of looking weak or having others get the best of him. He knew that would happen in a 1:1 with Dick Cheney.
But way off base to say the only thing Trump could “fear” from Cheney was losing the election
Trump is TERRIFIED of looking weak or having others get the best of him. He knew that would happen in a 1:1 with Dick Cheney.
I don’t think Trump’s fear of Cheney had anything to do with incriminating evidence
Like all schoolyard bullies, Trump is a coward. Trump knew Cheney could hit back hard, and that his usual attack line (left wing communist socialist liberal) wouldn’t work on the GOP’s Darth Vader
Like all schoolyard bullies, Trump is a coward. Trump knew Cheney could hit back hard, and that his usual attack line (left wing communist socialist liberal) wouldn’t work on the GOP’s Darth Vader
November 4, 2025 at 8:09 PM
I don’t think Trump’s fear of Cheney had anything to do with incriminating evidence
Like all schoolyard bullies, Trump is a coward. Trump knew Cheney could hit back hard, and that his usual attack line (left wing communist socialist liberal) wouldn’t work on the GOP’s Darth Vader
Like all schoolyard bullies, Trump is a coward. Trump knew Cheney could hit back hard, and that his usual attack line (left wing communist socialist liberal) wouldn’t work on the GOP’s Darth Vader
That’s because only the Republican Party has an industrial media complex to push its message, and because mainstream media feels compelled to follow RWM bc it’s afraid of being called biased
November 1, 2025 at 11:21 PM
That’s because only the Republican Party has an industrial media complex to push its message, and because mainstream media feels compelled to follow RWM bc it’s afraid of being called biased
Stop living in 2015 …
October 31, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Stop living in 2015 …
What you and other states need to do is make sure you have state criminal laws that cover everything Trump might pardon himself and his cronies for doing.
October 30, 2025 at 12:34 AM
What you and other states need to do is make sure you have state criminal laws that cover everything Trump might pardon himself and his cronies for doing.
Stupidity abounds, true
But much of the stupidity is the result of direct misinformation by ppl who profit from peddling it.
But much of the stupidity is the result of direct misinformation by ppl who profit from peddling it.
October 26, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Stupidity abounds, true
But much of the stupidity is the result of direct misinformation by ppl who profit from peddling it.
But much of the stupidity is the result of direct misinformation by ppl who profit from peddling it.
Kinda surprising that the GOP hasn’t tried to recruit him since this came out.
October 25, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Kinda surprising that the GOP hasn’t tried to recruit him since this came out.
We’ve ALWAYS had a (significant) portion of the population who lack critical thinking skills, but i agree their susceptibility to manipulation is a bigger threat in the age of weaponized disinformation through so many avenues (linear TV, pods, TikToks, Twitter algorithms etc)
Solution = 🤷♂️
Solution = 🤷♂️
October 24, 2025 at 7:51 PM
We’ve ALWAYS had a (significant) portion of the population who lack critical thinking skills, but i agree their susceptibility to manipulation is a bigger threat in the age of weaponized disinformation through so many avenues (linear TV, pods, TikToks, Twitter algorithms etc)
Solution = 🤷♂️
Solution = 🤷♂️
Don’t underestimate the “Fox News misinformation” component of this
Remember: Trump was comfortably ahead even before Kamala became the nominee (Biden was losing even BEFORE the debate)
I actually think disinformation was a bigger factor than racism, but that’s just a theory.
Remember: Trump was comfortably ahead even before Kamala became the nominee (Biden was losing even BEFORE the debate)
I actually think disinformation was a bigger factor than racism, but that’s just a theory.
October 24, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Don’t underestimate the “Fox News misinformation” component of this
Remember: Trump was comfortably ahead even before Kamala became the nominee (Biden was losing even BEFORE the debate)
I actually think disinformation was a bigger factor than racism, but that’s just a theory.
Remember: Trump was comfortably ahead even before Kamala became the nominee (Biden was losing even BEFORE the debate)
I actually think disinformation was a bigger factor than racism, but that’s just a theory.
You may not get everything you want w/the filibuster in place
But if you can manage a majority in the senate you can STOP further damage by republicans
Half a loaf is better than no loaf.
But if you can manage a majority in the senate you can STOP further damage by republicans
Half a loaf is better than no loaf.
October 23, 2025 at 10:15 PM
You may not get everything you want w/the filibuster in place
But if you can manage a majority in the senate you can STOP further damage by republicans
Half a loaf is better than no loaf.
But if you can manage a majority in the senate you can STOP further damage by republicans
Half a loaf is better than no loaf.
Honest Q: if you had seen that skull tattoo 6 months ago, would YOU have known it related to some Nazi unit 80 yrs ago?
If not, do you think it’s plausible that he didn’t know when he and his marine buddies all got drunk and said they wanted mean-looking tattoos?
Not a YR-type open Naziism IMO
If not, do you think it’s plausible that he didn’t know when he and his marine buddies all got drunk and said they wanted mean-looking tattoos?
Not a YR-type open Naziism IMO
October 23, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Honest Q: if you had seen that skull tattoo 6 months ago, would YOU have known it related to some Nazi unit 80 yrs ago?
If not, do you think it’s plausible that he didn’t know when he and his marine buddies all got drunk and said they wanted mean-looking tattoos?
Not a YR-type open Naziism IMO
If not, do you think it’s plausible that he didn’t know when he and his marine buddies all got drunk and said they wanted mean-looking tattoos?
Not a YR-type open Naziism IMO
The question isn’t whether anyone on this chat* wants to get rid of the filibuster, the question is do the VOTERS IN MAINE (Rs, Ds, and Is) want to get rid of the filibuster
If the answer is no, a majority do not want that, then Mills is perfect on this issue.
(* unless someone here is in ME)
If the answer is no, a majority do not want that, then Mills is perfect on this issue.
(* unless someone here is in ME)
October 23, 2025 at 1:48 PM
The question isn’t whether anyone on this chat* wants to get rid of the filibuster, the question is do the VOTERS IN MAINE (Rs, Ds, and Is) want to get rid of the filibuster
If the answer is no, a majority do not want that, then Mills is perfect on this issue.
(* unless someone here is in ME)
If the answer is no, a majority do not want that, then Mills is perfect on this issue.
(* unless someone here is in ME)
The problem is that almost any issue or fact-related poll is largely a proxy for “do you ❤️ 😡 or 🤷♂️ Trump”
Besides, with the paucity of violence (and keffiyehs), The Right had to instead attack the protesters as … geezers (?!).
Besides, with the paucity of violence (and keffiyehs), The Right had to instead attack the protesters as … geezers (?!).
October 22, 2025 at 11:23 AM
The problem is that almost any issue or fact-related poll is largely a proxy for “do you ❤️ 😡 or 🤷♂️ Trump”
Besides, with the paucity of violence (and keffiyehs), The Right had to instead attack the protesters as … geezers (?!).
Besides, with the paucity of violence (and keffiyehs), The Right had to instead attack the protesters as … geezers (?!).
Bezos doesn’t care. WaPo was a sacrificial lamb, offered to the Trump administration, to protect his infinitely larger business interests elsewhere.
October 14, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Bezos doesn’t care. WaPo was a sacrificial lamb, offered to the Trump administration, to protect his infinitely larger business interests elsewhere.
As much as I would like to be optimistic and think she was suddenly overcome with rational thought, I too suspect she may be laying the groundwork for a post-Trump populism in which she plans to thrive. Recall Trump too USED to claim he would protect entitlements/etc (then he won, and whoops!)
October 13, 2025 at 1:27 PM
As much as I would like to be optimistic and think she was suddenly overcome with rational thought, I too suspect she may be laying the groundwork for a post-Trump populism in which she plans to thrive. Recall Trump too USED to claim he would protect entitlements/etc (then he won, and whoops!)