Correct Question
@correctquestion.bsky.social
Stop pandering to the extremes: if given a choice of 90% of a loaf or no loaf, they will choose “no loaf” then accuse you of trying to starve them.
RIP Jane Goodall
My favorite anecdote was when The Far Side ran this cartoon. The Jane Goodall Institute was NOT amused, and threatened litigation, until it found out that Jane Goodall herself had seen the cartoon and thought it was hilarious.
🐐
www.cnn.com/2025/10/01/e...
My favorite anecdote was when The Far Side ran this cartoon. The Jane Goodall Institute was NOT amused, and threatened litigation, until it found out that Jane Goodall herself had seen the cartoon and thought it was hilarious.
🐐
www.cnn.com/2025/10/01/e...
October 1, 2025 at 8:54 PM
RIP Jane Goodall
My favorite anecdote was when The Far Side ran this cartoon. The Jane Goodall Institute was NOT amused, and threatened litigation, until it found out that Jane Goodall herself had seen the cartoon and thought it was hilarious.
🐐
www.cnn.com/2025/10/01/e...
My favorite anecdote was when The Far Side ran this cartoon. The Jane Goodall Institute was NOT amused, and threatened litigation, until it found out that Jane Goodall herself had seen the cartoon and thought it was hilarious.
🐐
www.cnn.com/2025/10/01/e...
“Antisemites on the far left are not part of the Democratic Party”
<antisemite on the left enters the chat>
Thanks for proving my point:
<antisemite on the left enters the chat>
Thanks for proving my point:
October 1, 2025 at 2:03 AM
“Antisemites on the far left are not part of the Democratic Party”
<antisemite on the left enters the chat>
Thanks for proving my point:
<antisemite on the left enters the chat>
Thanks for proving my point:
No Jake Tapper!
Yes they weren’t undercover agitators, but 274 overstates even the number who were sent to do crowd control after the fact.
274 includes not just crowd control but also agents who INVESTIGATED a variety of other J6 related issues!
It’s BS on top of BS.
Yes they weren’t undercover agitators, but 274 overstates even the number who were sent to do crowd control after the fact.
274 includes not just crowd control but also agents who INVESTIGATED a variety of other J6 related issues!
It’s BS on top of BS.
September 28, 2025 at 1:58 PM
No Jake Tapper!
Yes they weren’t undercover agitators, but 274 overstates even the number who were sent to do crowd control after the fact.
274 includes not just crowd control but also agents who INVESTIGATED a variety of other J6 related issues!
It’s BS on top of BS.
Yes they weren’t undercover agitators, but 274 overstates even the number who were sent to do crowd control after the fact.
274 includes not just crowd control but also agents who INVESTIGATED a variety of other J6 related issues!
It’s BS on top of BS.
🚨 Actually what’s MOST INTERESTING about this poster that MTG put up (beyond just the fact it’s the letter):
!!She included the SIGNATURE SAMPLES showing that Trump’s signature matches the Epstein letter 🤯!!
(Also telling that Trump is so far afraid to go after MTG directly for this)
!!She included the SIGNATURE SAMPLES showing that Trump’s signature matches the Epstein letter 🤯!!
(Also telling that Trump is so far afraid to go after MTG directly for this)
September 9, 2025 at 7:29 PM
🚨 Actually what’s MOST INTERESTING about this poster that MTG put up (beyond just the fact it’s the letter):
!!She included the SIGNATURE SAMPLES showing that Trump’s signature matches the Epstein letter 🤯!!
(Also telling that Trump is so far afraid to go after MTG directly for this)
!!She included the SIGNATURE SAMPLES showing that Trump’s signature matches the Epstein letter 🤯!!
(Also telling that Trump is so far afraid to go after MTG directly for this)
I actually can’t find anything on the daily signal website saying this, but given the source I’d say they reached that conclusion before the letter was even released
Anyway, give us the 3 experts’ names.
Anyway, give us the 3 experts’ names.
September 9, 2025 at 6:48 PM
I actually can’t find anything on the daily signal website saying this, but given the source I’d say they reached that conclusion before the letter was even released
Anyway, give us the 3 experts’ names.
Anyway, give us the 3 experts’ names.
Imagine explaining to someone in 2019 that in 2025 people would be stupid enough to believe that Israel had attacked Greta Thunberg while in Tunisia www.bbc.com/news/article...
September 9, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Imagine explaining to someone in 2019 that in 2025 people would be stupid enough to believe that Israel had attacked Greta Thunberg while in Tunisia www.bbc.com/news/article...
This headline encapsulates the entire dynamic between democratic and republican politics
September 7, 2025 at 12:48 PM
This headline encapsulates the entire dynamic between democratic and republican politics
Sometimes the originals are better
September 6, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Sometimes the originals are better
@3yearletterman (Twitter not here) would be proud. 👍
September 5, 2025 at 12:00 PM
@3yearletterman (Twitter not here) would be proud. 👍
Soviet Union anti-Israel propaganda, 1982
(“Stop the genocide…”)
(“Stop the genocide…”)
August 17, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Soviet Union anti-Israel propaganda, 1982
(“Stop the genocide…”)
(“Stop the genocide…”)
Putin is tiny. I actually think that picture shows how much *Trump* has shrunk.
For comparison:
(And Obama doesn’t claim to be 6’3”)
For comparison:
(And Obama doesn’t claim to be 6’3”)
August 16, 2025 at 8:53 AM
Putin is tiny. I actually think that picture shows how much *Trump* has shrunk.
For comparison:
(And Obama doesn’t claim to be 6’3”)
For comparison:
(And Obama doesn’t claim to be 6’3”)
17 blocks from this post alone, and counting.
The people who are the most extreme on these issues will tolerate no dissent in their TLs. They only want affirmation — kind of like the Fox News audience.
The people who are the most extreme on these issues will tolerate no dissent in their TLs. They only want affirmation — kind of like the Fox News audience.
August 9, 2025 at 7:12 PM
17 blocks from this post alone, and counting.
The people who are the most extreme on these issues will tolerate no dissent in their TLs. They only want affirmation — kind of like the Fox News audience.
The people who are the most extreme on these issues will tolerate no dissent in their TLs. They only want affirmation — kind of like the Fox News audience.
Case in point of my beef about how BlueSky has developed
Left activists users here tolerate no heterodox thoughts
I have no idea what I’ve ever said that is “far right” but it behooves people to put no stock in someone else’s block list.
Left activists users here tolerate no heterodox thoughts
I have no idea what I’ve ever said that is “far right” but it behooves people to put no stock in someone else’s block list.
August 7, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Case in point of my beef about how BlueSky has developed
Left activists users here tolerate no heterodox thoughts
I have no idea what I’ve ever said that is “far right” but it behooves people to put no stock in someone else’s block list.
Left activists users here tolerate no heterodox thoughts
I have no idea what I’ve ever said that is “far right” but it behooves people to put no stock in someone else’s block list.
Still one of my favorites
August 7, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Still one of my favorites
The youth bear part of the blame for Trump, but not because of Luigi, Mamdani, or trans.
Rather, bc large #s of them were MAGA-like fooled into believing that Trump would bring down grocery prices, end the war in Gaza, etc.
Rather, bc large #s of them were MAGA-like fooled into believing that Trump would bring down grocery prices, end the war in Gaza, etc.
August 7, 2025 at 10:39 AM
The youth bear part of the blame for Trump, but not because of Luigi, Mamdani, or trans.
Rather, bc large #s of them were MAGA-like fooled into believing that Trump would bring down grocery prices, end the war in Gaza, etc.
Rather, bc large #s of them were MAGA-like fooled into believing that Trump would bring down grocery prices, end the war in Gaza, etc.
Unfortunately I think this is not quite correct
Yes, the GOP in Texas is trying to cheat
BUT it’s not bc of increasing # of POC (mainly Latinos), bc especially in Texas those ppl disproportionately supported Trump!
Yes, the GOP in Texas is trying to cheat
BUT it’s not bc of increasing # of POC (mainly Latinos), bc especially in Texas those ppl disproportionately supported Trump!
August 4, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Unfortunately I think this is not quite correct
Yes, the GOP in Texas is trying to cheat
BUT it’s not bc of increasing # of POC (mainly Latinos), bc especially in Texas those ppl disproportionately supported Trump!
Yes, the GOP in Texas is trying to cheat
BUT it’s not bc of increasing # of POC (mainly Latinos), bc especially in Texas those ppl disproportionately supported Trump!
Why does Donald Trump look so tiny next to Lara Trump …? Is he shrinking? 🧐
July 14, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Why does Donald Trump look so tiny next to Lara Trump …? Is he shrinking? 🧐
Well there was no disagreement since no one had said anything about blocks before I stated my theory
But even if someone DID disagree, and thus THOUGHT I was picking a fight
Doesn’t that prove my point that they blocked bc they didn’t like what I was saying (ie, blocked bc they disagreed with me)?
But even if someone DID disagree, and thus THOUGHT I was picking a fight
Doesn’t that prove my point that they blocked bc they didn’t like what I was saying (ie, blocked bc they disagreed with me)?
July 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Well there was no disagreement since no one had said anything about blocks before I stated my theory
But even if someone DID disagree, and thus THOUGHT I was picking a fight
Doesn’t that prove my point that they blocked bc they didn’t like what I was saying (ie, blocked bc they disagreed with me)?
But even if someone DID disagree, and thus THOUGHT I was picking a fight
Doesn’t that prove my point that they blocked bc they didn’t like what I was saying (ie, blocked bc they disagreed with me)?
Oh and by the way, the person to whom I was responding above … has already blocked me
Because I was being obscene? Abusive? Obnoxious? Threatening?
No, just didn’t like hearing what I had to say.
I could give hundreds of examples but always helpful to have an instant one right here.
Because I was being obscene? Abusive? Obnoxious? Threatening?
No, just didn’t like hearing what I had to say.
I could give hundreds of examples but always helpful to have an instant one right here.
July 13, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Oh and by the way, the person to whom I was responding above … has already blocked me
Because I was being obscene? Abusive? Obnoxious? Threatening?
No, just didn’t like hearing what I had to say.
I could give hundreds of examples but always helpful to have an instant one right here.
Because I was being obscene? Abusive? Obnoxious? Threatening?
No, just didn’t like hearing what I had to say.
I could give hundreds of examples but always helpful to have an instant one right here.
Trump bragging about his biggest tax increase in history, a regressive tax which hurts the poor but the rich can mostly shrug off.
July 12, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Trump bragging about his biggest tax increase in history, a regressive tax which hurts the poor but the rich can mostly shrug off.
“Fanaticism and ignorance is forever busy, and needs feeding”
(scopes monkey trial)
(scopes monkey trial)
July 11, 2025 at 7:29 PM
“Fanaticism and ignorance is forever busy, and needs feeding”
(scopes monkey trial)
(scopes monkey trial)
You say that like it was a secret or generally unknown.
July 10, 2025 at 9:07 AM
You say that like it was a secret or generally unknown.
Elon was right about at least one thing.
July 9, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Elon was right about at least one thing.
Quote with your favorite anti-fascist film
“We’ve tried everything - he won’t break. Should we get out the Leroy Neiman paintings?”
“No. We cannot risk violating the Geneva Convention”
“We’ve tried everything - he won’t break. Should we get out the Leroy Neiman paintings?”
“No. We cannot risk violating the Geneva Convention”
July 6, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Quote with your favorite anti-fascist film
“We’ve tried everything - he won’t break. Should we get out the Leroy Neiman paintings?”
“No. We cannot risk violating the Geneva Convention”
“We’ve tried everything - he won’t break. Should we get out the Leroy Neiman paintings?”
“No. We cannot risk violating the Geneva Convention”
No, it will not be "very easy" for Dems to pummel the GOP, because Democrats are led by a bunch of geriatrics who SUCK at messaging while embracing the weirdest and most nonsensical positions of the extreme left.
July 3, 2025 at 7:38 PM
No, it will not be "very easy" for Dems to pummel the GOP, because Democrats are led by a bunch of geriatrics who SUCK at messaging while embracing the weirdest and most nonsensical positions of the extreme left.