Would like to see that !!

And as much as this should not be a thing, she is another of the bigots that will be challenged in the loos.

I'm sorry what? He platforms anti trans bigots, allowed the entry of "single sex spaces" into his manifesto.

I don't want him near any form of power anymore.

He certainly does not belong in GPEW.

I wouldn't count on it. Fascism is spreading like a highly contagious virus. I can't foresee a safe future ever.

I'd argue I am qualified, but my nerves could not withstand the barrage of abuse just from applying as the name will be released, let alone if I got the job.

Party McPartyFace is probably more appropriate for the joke they are.

Its hardly a victory when they can get away with ignoring the order with impunity.

Notwithstanding any of the issue of non binary, the fucking bastard has given the green light to misgender with impunity. This judgment is wrong on so many levels.

The writer of this article is an arse. Its not a "deeply divisive issue". There are a small but very vocal minority who want us to believe it is divisive when in fact, most people do not see it that way. Unless you argue that 99%/1% is "deeply divisive" in which case you're a moron.

Look at the words. Nothing to be grateful for. This is still suggesting we shouldn't have some rights to protect women. No lib dems are good.

When you say "protect everyone's rights" all i hear is that you dont understand. The guidance takes away trans people rights. Its not "everyone's" rights that need protecting in this context. You're suggesting that we shouldn't have some rights to "protect' women. You'll always be bigots.

Or Mothin. This just shows me, GPEW are still not safe for trans people.

That said, your original point is absolutely right. She should be nowhere near any platform, let alone BBC.

She is half right. The "Judgment" is a model of simplicity and clarity:s9(3) excludes GRC holders from EA2010. The written reasons that accompany that Judgment are, however, muddled, come from animus and plain wrong.