Conan D. Yossarian
@conantheyossarian.bsky.social
If I were an amalgam of oligarchical interests whose plans were foiled in the 20th century, I'd manufacture rerolls for the 21st with better tools and propaganda.
Guess how we know that you don't know what fascism is.
September 30, 2025 at 10:57 PM
Guess how we know that you don't know what fascism is.
You're cycling between lying and calling me names then. (I'll pretend you haven't tried to argue my own point so many times)
September 19, 2025 at 7:10 PM
You're cycling between lying and calling me names then. (I'll pretend you haven't tried to argue my own point so many times)
Goddamn right they did. Here's evidence they price fixed resale tickets for individuals so brokers could buy at half-price and upcharge.
September 18, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Goddamn right they did. Here's evidence they price fixed resale tickets for individuals so brokers could buy at half-price and upcharge.
I researched this using information curated by the CDC while you were being spoonfed marketing nonsense.
That's how I know you can't call mRNA therapy for Covid, "medicine."
That's how I know you can't call mRNA therapy for Covid, "medicine."
September 3, 2025 at 4:27 PM
I researched this using information curated by the CDC while you were being spoonfed marketing nonsense.
That's how I know you can't call mRNA therapy for Covid, "medicine."
That's how I know you can't call mRNA therapy for Covid, "medicine."
You are agreeing with me that your statement was misleading and outright false depending on which state mail in ballots are processed in.
A signature has to be present, it is not checked so that the voter's name can be referenced and checked off as having voted.
A signature has to be present, it is not checked so that the voter's name can be referenced and checked off as having voted.
August 26, 2025 at 5:08 PM
You are agreeing with me that your statement was misleading and outright false depending on which state mail in ballots are processed in.
A signature has to be present, it is not checked so that the voter's name can be referenced and checked off as having voted.
A signature has to be present, it is not checked so that the voter's name can be referenced and checked off as having voted.
If you can't bother to comprehend your own statements, you shouldn't try to tell me what I understand.
August 26, 2025 at 4:24 PM
If you can't bother to comprehend your own statements, you shouldn't try to tell me what I understand.
Talk to the CDC and the global records they curated.
August 19, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Talk to the CDC and the global records they curated.
I've already demonstrated that per FDA documentation it was not. You are clearly not a source of truth.
You must miss the days where I would just be censored.
You must miss the days where I would just be censored.
August 1, 2025 at 9:07 PM
I've already demonstrated that per FDA documentation it was not. You are clearly not a source of truth.
You must miss the days where I would just be censored.
You must miss the days where I would just be censored.
Wrong snip. My sincerest apologies.
August 1, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Wrong snip. My sincerest apologies.
I'm glad you mentioned it.
Here's the document from the FDA that records the fact that phase 3 trials of BNT162b2 were not complete when when the summary basis for Comirnaty approval was recorded.
All kinds of corners were cut, but you insist the science is infallible.
www.fda.gov/media/151733
Here's the document from the FDA that records the fact that phase 3 trials of BNT162b2 were not complete when when the summary basis for Comirnaty approval was recorded.
All kinds of corners were cut, but you insist the science is infallible.
www.fda.gov/media/151733
August 1, 2025 at 5:20 PM
I'm glad you mentioned it.
Here's the document from the FDA that records the fact that phase 3 trials of BNT162b2 were not complete when when the summary basis for Comirnaty approval was recorded.
All kinds of corners were cut, but you insist the science is infallible.
www.fda.gov/media/151733
Here's the document from the FDA that records the fact that phase 3 trials of BNT162b2 were not complete when when the summary basis for Comirnaty approval was recorded.
All kinds of corners were cut, but you insist the science is infallible.
www.fda.gov/media/151733
August 1, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Says the account that claimed human trials begin at phase 3.
August 1, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Says the account that claimed human trials begin at phase 3.
July 31, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Again, as demonstrated in that Summary Basis for Regulatory Action (approval of comirnaty) published by the FDA, Comirnaty is legally and compositionally distinct from BNT162b2.
That document also confirms that phase 3 trials were ongoing when approval was granted, based on test results from rats.
That document also confirms that phase 3 trials were ongoing when approval was granted, based on test results from rats.
July 31, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Again, as demonstrated in that Summary Basis for Regulatory Action (approval of comirnaty) published by the FDA, Comirnaty is legally and compositionally distinct from BNT162b2.
That document also confirms that phase 3 trials were ongoing when approval was granted, based on test results from rats.
That document also confirms that phase 3 trials were ongoing when approval was granted, based on test results from rats.
This doesn't conflate BNT162b2 with comirnaty like the Australian docs.
This coutesy of regulatory documentation from the FDA www.fda.gov/media/151733
This coutesy of regulatory documentation from the FDA www.fda.gov/media/151733
July 31, 2025 at 3:48 PM
This doesn't conflate BNT162b2 with comirnaty like the Australian docs.
This coutesy of regulatory documentation from the FDA www.fda.gov/media/151733
This coutesy of regulatory documentation from the FDA www.fda.gov/media/151733
Yes that does conflate comirnaty with BNT162b2, so Australias legal framework supports your assertion of brand name. It should still be noted that this is not legally acceptable in the US, which is where I live.
The attachments at that site also undermine the viability of pediatric treatment.
The attachments at that site also undermine the viability of pediatric treatment.
July 31, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Yes that does conflate comirnaty with BNT162b2, so Australias legal framework supports your assertion of brand name. It should still be noted that this is not legally acceptable in the US, which is where I live.
The attachments at that site also undermine the viability of pediatric treatment.
The attachments at that site also undermine the viability of pediatric treatment.
There is no phase 3.
July 31, 2025 at 2:21 PM
There is no phase 3.
Goodness, you like to make assumptions to appear informed. Where is this "phase 3 trial," you keep referring to, and how should it ethically apply to pediatric studies.
July 31, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Goodness, you like to make assumptions to appear informed. Where is this "phase 3 trial," you keep referring to, and how should it ethically apply to pediatric studies.
Petty, Alison Meyer.
July 31, 2025 at 3:35 AM
Petty, Alison Meyer.
It was a violation of the federal authorizations of emergency use to pretend that the vaccine granted emerhency use and Comirnaty were equivalent. So the the FDA let 3rd parties equivocate.
www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...
www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...
July 31, 2025 at 12:34 AM
It was a violation of the federal authorizations of emergency use to pretend that the vaccine granted emerhency use and Comirnaty were equivalent. So the the FDA let 3rd parties equivocate.
www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...
www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...