absolute dreck. one of the speakers immediately claims that "wokeness" is inherently feminized? how are these people writing entire books about words they don't even know the history or meaning of?

I've come up with like 3 somewhat interesting constructions these past couple weeks by just be like "what if" and then writing it down

For the math folks on here: NSF has suspended Terry Tao's grant. www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/...

do tell?

So within six months of this, he was dead

another win for the algebra failsons, fuck it degree of a coherent sheaf is the the degree of the determinant sheaf. Fuck it they're all vector bundles

Minkowski's theorem (on symmetric convex bodies and lattice points)?

Sorry, the metaplectic group is just a double cover. No Whitehead tower shenanigans here. It's interesting though, spin geometry is traditionally fruitful as a geometric theory because the universal cover of GL^+(n, R) has no faithful finite dimensional reps while Spin(n) does.

When you've done all this, the next step is defining symplectic dirac operators. The corresponding heat kernel should encode symplectic invariants as coefficients of its asymptotic expansion as a pseudodifferential operator?

But Weyl algebras have no finite dimensional representations: the canonical commutation relation cannot be satisfied by finite rank matrices. Indeed, 0 = Tr([x,p]) = Tr(id) = dim V in finite dim. So you necessarily need to move to the setting of Banach bundles (in particular L²(E)) for such geometry

In symplectic spin geometry, one considers a principal metaplectic group (universal cover of Symp(n)) bundle covering of the symplectic frame bundle. This endows E->M with the structure of a Weyl(E)-module. Weyl(R^n) is the symplectic deformation of the exterior algebra.