clearanceunicorn.bsky.social
@clearanceunicorn.bsky.social
My cat resembles that remark
November 20, 2025 at 2:05 PM
The only thing more expensive and less effective in preventing re-offending than the current carceral regime.
November 13, 2025 at 11:23 AM
Strong choice but I default to Legion of the Rearguard in such situations
October 30, 2025 at 11:54 AM
I for one welcome our new feline overdykes
August 22, 2025 at 3:01 AM
The Suffragettes didn't fight for the right of all women to vote, but for those women who met the same criteria as men (property owners) to vote; it was the Suffragists who fought for universal suffrage for all adults.
August 19, 2025 at 3:51 PM
And the punitive damages awarded by the jury was calculated to be *one day* of the profits McDonalds made from selling coffee
August 19, 2025 at 3:30 PM
PS: we can deduce Ms Sits was not confessing to Father Alberto because if she had, he would have refused to answer the question on his own.
May 24, 2025 at 7:10 AM
... and save their soul without fearing earthly punishments, so I’m going to say the answer is B: Ms Sits was not confessing her sins and seeking divine absolution, so her ‘confidential’ remarks carry only the strength of me asking you to ‘keep this a secret’. 2/2
May 24, 2025 at 7:01 AM