Chris Sprigman
@cjsprigman.bsky.social
Murray and Kathleen Bring Prof., NYU Law. IP, antitrust. ssrn.com/author=370802. Partner, Lex Lumina LLP. lex-lumina.com. All posts by my research assistant, Chad. https://its.law.nyu.edu/facultyprofiles/index.cfm?fuseaction=profile.overview&personid=37891
You are delusional. Your party just surrendered, again. No one—including the GOP and even your own voters—takes you seriously.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 AM
You are delusional. Your party just surrendered, again. No one—including the GOP and even your own voters—takes you seriously.
Will his anger result in a vote to replace Schumer? If it doesn't, then what good is his anger?
November 10, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Will his anger result in a vote to replace Schumer? If it doesn't, then what good is his anger?
Not sure I fully understand your post ... let what go? And also, not sure what it means to "lose the caucus." Does it mean that Murphy, or others, will vote to replace Schumer as leader? If not, then they are complicit in what Schumer stage-managed here.
November 10, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Not sure I fully understand your post ... let what go? And also, not sure what it means to "lose the caucus." Does it mean that Murphy, or others, will vote to replace Schumer as leader? If not, then they are complicit in what Schumer stage-managed here.
Schumer didn't want his fingerprints on it. But they are there. And so-called "warriors" like Murphy are mostly hot air. They vote to retain Schumer in his position. /end
November 10, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Schumer didn't want his fingerprints on it. But they are there. And so-called "warriors" like Murphy are mostly hot air. They vote to retain Schumer in his position. /end
I don’t see you fighting. Fighting, in this circumstance, would be getting rid of Chuck Schumer. Are you proposing to do that?
November 10, 2025 at 4:33 PM
I don’t see you fighting. Fighting, in this circumstance, would be getting rid of Chuck Schumer. Are you proposing to do that?
Schumer gave Ossoff cover. Ossoff is just as responsible as the rest of the Senate Dem caucus. They vote to keep Schumer--a man with no spine--in his job.
November 10, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Schumer gave Ossoff cover. Ossoff is just as responsible as the rest of the Senate Dem caucus. They vote to keep Schumer--a man with no spine--in his job.
So do we know this in the p < 0.05 sense? Not quite, I suppose. But pretty close.
November 10, 2025 at 2:31 PM
So do we know this in the p < 0.05 sense? Not quite, I suppose. But pretty close.
We do know that Schumer knew exactly what the 8 turncoats were doing, and wanted to do it himself, but engineered it so that only retiring Senators and those not up in 2026 would have their fingerprints on it. He wouldn't do any of it if he thought Jeffries wouldn't deliver the votes in the House.
November 10, 2025 at 2:25 PM
We do know that Schumer knew exactly what the 8 turncoats were doing, and wanted to do it himself, but engineered it so that only retiring Senators and those not up in 2026 would have their fingerprints on it. He wouldn't do any of it if he thought Jeffries wouldn't deliver the votes in the House.
You can ask the same of House Democrats re Jeffries. bsky.app/profile/amer...
8) This also puts the House in the jackpot.
Will House Republicans vote to accept the Senate deal? If they defect, how many Dems will vote to make up the difference. (Answer: as many Dems as it takes, Jeffries will see to this. While publicly "no," he'll make the plan work.)
Will House Republicans vote to accept the Senate deal? If they defect, how many Dems will vote to make up the difference. (Answer: as many Dems as it takes, Jeffries will see to this. While publicly "no," he'll make the plan work.)
November 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM
You can ask the same of House Democrats re Jeffries. bsky.app/profile/amer...
Also, these carefully choreographed press releases have the distinct odor of bullshit.
November 10, 2025 at 5:02 AM
Also, these carefully choreographed press releases have the distinct odor of bullshit.
They can vote to oust Schumer tomorrow. Until they do, they are content to have the Democrats be the party of repeated, grinding, disastrous failure.
November 10, 2025 at 4:16 AM
They can vote to oust Schumer tomorrow. Until they do, they are content to have the Democrats be the party of repeated, grinding, disastrous failure.