Christel Hellberg
banner
christelh.bsky.social
Christel Hellberg
@christelh.bsky.social
Interested in systematic reviews and other types of evidence synthesis as well as evidence based research. PhD in medicine.
Intresserad av systematiska översikter och annan typ av forskningssammanställningar.
Varje dag publiceras ett nytt fall som belyser problem och inkonsekvenser i akademiska artiklar och vetenskapliga tidskrifter. Din uppgift? Att hitta felet!

Som ett exempel lägger jag in Lucka 1: Ser du något som verkar inkonsekvent eller misstänkt i dessa sammanfattande statistikuppgifter?
December 2, 2025 at 8:08 AM
This is a image from a swedish pharmacy add. I have some questions….
October 27, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Hur många dygn är det egentligen kvar?
September 30, 2025 at 5:39 AM
Rainbow!
August 5, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Wery thoughtful quote in today’s keynote “Fixing our broken science-policy pipelines: Evidence-Based X” by Gavin Stewart #ESMARConf2025 @eshackathon.bsky.social
June 12, 2025 at 8:41 AM
Only 4 % of systematic reviews in ecology and evolution includes RoB assessment of primary studies!
June 12, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Unfortunately, most meta-analysis are of poor quality. Keynote by @asanchez-tojar.bsky.social at #ESMARConf2025.
www.youtube.com/live/JFTxtOI...
June 12, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Today’s extraction quiz! What is the 95% CI for the different interventions?
March 25, 2025 at 8:26 AM
Spring!
March 23, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Please, think about the readers when you make graphs for your papers. In this example I just encountered it is very hard to make out the data due to 1) overlap of the data series and 2) too many datapoints plotted. 3) all in black
March 13, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Post a photo you took with no context to bring some zen to the timeline.
March 10, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Skiing
February 26, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Current trying to extract mean and error bars from this figure. Why would anyone overlay the bars like this? Mission impossible.
February 18, 2025 at 7:08 AM
When using R-packages or shiny apps, do you remember to cite them in your publications?
I think this is an important way of giving credit for the work that goes in to developing these amazing recourses.

Let’s all help each other to improve!
#ScientificPublishing
#Methodology
#SystematicReveiw
December 12, 2024 at 9:31 AM
One of the most common misconceptions in published systematic reveiws is ralated to the PRISMA guidelines.
Let us look at item 5-8.
To follow them you need to present
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria
- ALL databases searched
- ALL search strategies in full
- Number of persons involved in screening
December 10, 2024 at 12:21 PM
Det vegetariska alternativet känns lite fantasilöst.
September 4, 2024 at 6:15 AM