that’s the nicest thing anyone’s ever said to me. you know what, you’re right, i *do* deserve not to get fungus!

#manscience

reenée zellweger?

i have a feeling it’s drunk 24/7, why else would its name sound like someone heavily slurring their speech

lol since when?

every freaking time!

nice 👌

ok camus

oropharyngeal cancer

historians have proposed a new delineator of prehistory: before robot dog toy (BRDT) and after robot dog toy (ARDT). under this system, 2002 would be 2-ARDT. so you are correct, it isn’t ancient, but it’s close

so yes, there is a distinction. it’s just that nobody appears to have told the liberal democrats that there is one lol. so trading on that distinction, as you are here, is - as i said - disingenuous

there is not necessarily anything inherent in being socially liberal that makes it so one has to be a neoliberal, nobody is saying that. what’s being said is that the liberal democrat party demonstrably are neoliberals

absolutely

so while the poster can make a case for the lib dems not being at particular fault in this one specific case, acting like there’s really a huge difference between “real liberalism” and the neoliberalism being criticised is pretty disingenuous

yeah but the liberal democrats *are* economically neoliberal, so while the distinction is real, it’s not really exactly that relevant here