Depending on how toxic/gelled the team is at least.
Depending on how toxic/gelled the team is at least.
As for Klein, that Ta-Nehisi Coates interview was pretty much the nail in the coffin.
As for Klein, that Ta-Nehisi Coates interview was pretty much the nail in the coffin.
Your kiddos are in for a great time :)
Your kiddos are in for a great time :)
It was a bad post.
It was a bad post.
You also can't blame "no one really cares as long as they get to be cathartically angry". Im sure there are some unhinged folks online, but most people just found it obnoxious and disagree with you.
You also can't blame "no one really cares as long as they get to be cathartically angry". Im sure there are some unhinged folks online, but most people just found it obnoxious and disagree with you.
Really appreciate the attributed quote that no one said, really clarifies what you're doing. Especially when you are also assigning me someone i don't say.
Really appreciate the attributed quote that no one said, really clarifies what you're doing. Especially when you are also assigning me someone i don't say.
I would speak to what you want to say, and avoid trying to tell me what im saying.
I would speak to what you want to say, and avoid trying to tell me what im saying.
I think Will is being a contrarian, especially as his initial post was about what a good use of a campaign manager's time is and then pivoted to potential finance issues.
I think Will is being a contrarian, especially as his initial post was about what a good use of a campaign manager's time is and then pivoted to potential finance issues.
It'll take up too much space, and probably cause some kind of marital strife. Potentially decent coffee tho
It'll take up too much space, and probably cause some kind of marital strife. Potentially decent coffee tho
I want her mutual aid to work.
I want her campaign financials and ethics to work.
There is room for both.
I want her mutual aid to work.
I want her campaign financials and ethics to work.
There is room for both.
The issue here is WHO it is ambiguous to - the campaign just might have a better understanding of this than you do!
Like the thing here is it sounds like you have some questions you need to resolve.
The issue here is WHO it is ambiguous to - the campaign just might have a better understanding of this than you do!
Like the thing here is it sounds like you have some questions you need to resolve.
*Brain falls out of hat*
*Brain falls out of hat*
Attributing its fall to the aspects of the party that were largely its most successful components is wild.
Attributing its fall to the aspects of the party that were largely its most successful components is wild.
That said, the DOJ did have this and could have done that - but Garland again was trying to be sober, slow, blah blah
That said, the DOJ did have this and could have done that - but Garland again was trying to be sober, slow, blah blah