Chris Hopwood
@chopwood.bsky.social
UZH Psychology Professor
Personality, Interpersonal Processes, Human-Animal Intergroup Relations
Editor https://phair.psychopen.eu/index.php/phair
Personality, Interpersonal Processes, Human-Animal Intergroup Relations
Editor https://phair.psychopen.eu/index.php/phair
Reposted by Chris Hopwood
#2 "Personality functioning as generalized correlated changes in personality traits" -- basically a large factor model over time with some common factor nuance. With @chopwood.bsky.social et al.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io/preprints/ps...
September 25, 2025 at 9:36 AM
#2 "Personality functioning as generalized correlated changes in personality traits" -- basically a large factor model over time with some common factor nuance. With @chopwood.bsky.social et al.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io/preprints/ps...
Right. They tested the claim that plant based diet causes depression etc via vitamin deficiency. This is the first experimental evidence I’m aware of.
May 21, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Right. They tested the claim that plant based diet causes depression etc via vitamin deficiency. This is the first experimental evidence I’m aware of.
In practice I’d use SSM and then you can use bootstrapped CIs a la journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Beyond Description in Interpersonal Construct Validation - Johannes Zimmermann, Aidan G. C. Wright, 2017
The interpersonal circumplex is a well-established structural model that organizes interpersonal functioning within the two-dimensional space marked by dominanc...
journals.sagepub.com
April 27, 2025 at 3:50 AM
In practice I’d use SSM and then you can use bootstrapped CIs a la journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
But I stand by the frame bc these can all be true: /researchers should try to do studies that matter and asking clinicians helps find out what that is, /between subjects studies are over represented because they are easy to do, /it is still hard to translate clinically useful research to practice.
April 5, 2025 at 4:29 AM
But I stand by the frame bc these can all be true: /researchers should try to do studies that matter and asking clinicians helps find out what that is, /between subjects studies are over represented because they are easy to do, /it is still hard to translate clinically useful research to practice.
My thinking was that I often hear a reflexive attitude among researchers that clinicians don’t have time or ability to make use of research, and this produces a cynicism that defends against engaging with clinical ppl and reflecting on the value of our work. Arguably a bridge too far here.
April 5, 2025 at 2:11 AM
My thinking was that I often hear a reflexive attitude among researchers that clinicians don’t have time or ability to make use of research, and this produces a cynicism that defends against engaging with clinical ppl and reflecting on the value of our work. Arguably a bridge too far here.
I get it. We were not trying to imply we’d found the silver bullet to imp sci but I can see how, to a person in that area, it came across as naive or sensational, and the focus of reactions on here reinforces your point. In retrospect maybe we (mostly I) knew that would grab attention
April 5, 2025 at 2:07 AM
I get it. We were not trying to imply we’d found the silver bullet to imp sci but I can see how, to a person in that area, it came across as naive or sensational, and the focus of reactions on here reinforces your point. In retrospect maybe we (mostly I) knew that would grab attention