What's interesting about this is they're not really enforcing criminal law, right? Status is a civil issue. Also, states can enforce rights even if the feds (Congress or otherwise) won't. The chilling effect I want to see is ICE goon/wannabe thugs understanding that they are not above the law.

Pretty sure you can't pepper-ball a priest for praying. That seems obvious. Also, sometimes the mere act of indicting is a message, in itself, amIright? I mean... (gestures to DoJ)

Great minds: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/stat...

I wonder at what point Illinois will pursue assault/battery charges (Pres. pardon inapplicable to state convictions)

Ellis: "What I'm looking at is, how are these agents enforcing the laws? Are they doing so in a manner that is violating other people's Constitutional rights? If that's the case, that has to stop."

While I agree with you, sir, perhaps this is something that can be brought to the negotiating table? An AUMF (with whatever limitations are necessary/prudent) in exchange for extending the credits, to help end the shutdown, open the govt, swear her in, and release the Epstein files.

Can we please please PLEASE have an ad featuring Paris Hilton washing a car in a bikini being distracted by the wind blowing in Gov. Newsom's hair, going "That's hot." ?

Sir, I think the word you're looking for is not "cruel," but rather, "corrupt."

So glad I'm not the only one. I've been walking around singing it for days.

It would seem that Florida Man is entering the FO stage.