We’re watching masters at work

Unlike ACA credits, that insane provision allowing eight of them to sue Jack Smith seems like something they actually could’ve stripped out and changed at any time if they’d bothered to read it

Look we’re already setting other international norms on fire like uhh “children shouldn’t starve to death”. So an official rewrite is probably coming down the line anyway

Is the legislative solution to all of this just as simple as the next D trifecta legalizing it nationally? Or is there some more nuance and complexity needed here?

A prohibition movement ready to make weed de facto illegal again seems like it’ll be ready to roll again in the future, but it seems like it’d be a death by a thousand cuts type situation, in lieu of the very long odds of outright making it illegal again in legal states

They cut a trillion dollars out of Medicaid this year and the most charitable interpretation you can offer is that they genuinely do believe it’s wasteful and they don’t know it’s mostly their constituents who get it

I think the states where it’s fully legal don’t want other states where it isn’t cutting into their market. And then there are the conservatives who still think none of this shit should be legal as a matter of principle. @snowden.st can educate us all though

Particularly if they’re going to be that terrible

What he doesn’t want to say but is plainly obvious is Democrats will lose the subsequent ACA vote and Democrats would rather that happen so the president takes the blame. I’m not even against that as a strategy on a pure political level, but all the other language round it is maddening

They don’t, but that’s never stopped a perfect Truth Social post from going out

Buying a Corolla the day your child is born and paying it off the same day they get their license

Beautiful state, weird people

Don’t have to go that far. He’ll eventually gamble it away and you can get it for a steal from a short sale