They know how unpopular this plan is—that's why despite Republican majorities in Congress, they're choosing to do this ILLEGALLY.
They know how unpopular this plan is—that's why despite Republican majorities in Congress, they're choosing to do this ILLEGALLY.
They should not have done that. It has had foreseeable negative consequences. They should have gone with the Constitution and over two centuries of precedent instead.
They should not have done that. It has had foreseeable negative consequences. They should have gone with the Constitution and over two centuries of precedent instead.
open.substack.com/pub/stevemag...
open.substack.com/pub/stevemag...
www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
We need to quit calling them “judges.” They are merely implementing executive branch policies. Nothing judicial about it.
www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
We need to quit calling them “judges.” They are merely implementing executive branch policies. Nothing judicial about it.
He can do this because, thanks to the Supreme Court’s recent decisions, the executive branch could accurately be described by King Louis XIV—L’état, c’est Trump.
He can do this because, thanks to the Supreme Court’s recent decisions, the executive branch could accurately be described by King Louis XIV—L’état, c’est Trump.
Full Story: wapo.st/42RiU2q
Know your First Amendment
Know your First Amendment
open.substack.com/pub/thebulwa...
open.substack.com/pub/thebulwa...