Here’s the simple version: Fusion lets a political party nominate a candidate who’s already been nominated by another party — often a minor party cross-nominating a major-party candidate.

Listen to the Podcast on Spotify, Apple, or YouTube

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...

open.spotify.com/show/7xxKRiD...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=khnn...

So no, Elon, I don’t think your new party is the solution.
But maybe—just maybe—you’re the chaotic neutral force it needs to expose the cracks and force a reckoning. Stranger things have happened.

Elon, as an engineer, you’ll appreciate:
We have a systemic design flaw.
A party system problem needs a party system solution.
There’s no secret knob. No clever hack.

Proportional Representation = Multi-member districts.
If a party receives 30% of the vote, it will likely secure ~30% of the seats. That’s how democracies around the world make space for more than two parties.

Fusion Voting = Minor + major parties nominating the same candidate. Each party’s votes are counted separately, allowing smaller parties to demonstrate their impact and gain leverage. Still used in parts of New York and Connecticut. It’s how third parties get power, not just vibes.

If you want REAL multiparty democracy, two changes matter: Fusion Voting & Proportional Representation
Everything else is noise.

Remember when No Labels flirted with a centrist 2024 run? They raised $25 million and still couldn’t get a candidate.
Not even Manchin wanted to risk being a spoiler.
RFK Jr.? Ended up joining Trump.
Because third parties can’t win. And they know it.

What’s actually broken is how we hold elections. In single-winner districts, third parties have no shot. Votes get wasted. So it all funnels into the same two-party doom loop. Political scientists have a name for this: Duverger’s Law.

Most “independents” are not centrists.
Most “moderates” hold strong partisan views.
Swing voters? All over the ideological map.
So, no—there’s no hidden army of chill, reasonable voters just waiting for the America Party.

Yes, the two-party system is broken.
Yes, voters are alienated.
60–72% say they want a third party.
38% say neither party fights for them.
But that mythical “middle” you’re chasing? It’s not real.

A single third party doesn’t fix the system. It just spoils elections. If you want to represent the “unrepresented middle,” you’d need 5 or 6 new parties. And real electoral reform.

But here’s the thing: You’re thinking about this all wrong.
If there really were an 80% centrist consensus in this country, NoLabels would’ve made Joe Manchin president by now. They didn’t even make it out of the gate.