And planning for and responding to climate change.
And supporting immigrants.
And creating a public health care option.
And protecting the water.

thank you! (Selfishly, I was just taking the opportunity to review for my final exam.)

But, I misspelled judgment!

Oh no! I haven't learned that one yet!

It is allowed by discretion of the court (fairness to defendant, ease of joining first case, no previous opposite verdicts) when a second (or more) plaintiff wants to use issue preclusion for an unfavorable judgement against the same defendant as in the first case. (1L in civ pro here.)

I hope it goes well.

When is it?

It was so good to have you join us! And, offensive non-mutual issue preclusion finally came up in class this week (I believe the doctrine was mentioned in the context of the tariff/IEEPA lawsuit)!

It might look like I'm just reading Bluesky, but really, I'm reviewing for my final in Civ Pro.

Keep pushing! It is so important!

Amazing. I've never known a camp survivor, but my grandmother told stories of her best friend and family from The Dalles being incarcerated.

As far as I remember, it is all for one additional climbing lane to achieve "minimal congestion" targets.

This is relevant line from Youngstown, Frankfurter's concurrence:
"The accretion of dangerous power does not come in a day. It does come, however slowly, from the generative force of unchecked disregard of the restrictions that fence in even the most disinterested assertion of authority."

I had guessed it wasn't a Katyal original. Thank you for sharing the origin! (The 15 yo was listening and said "WHOA" at that point.)

"the existence of emergency powers begs the creation of emergencies" was one of my favorite Neal Katyal moments. (Paraphrasing his perfect phrase.)

Practice pleadings and discovery requests for possible breach of an outputs contract (under UCC 2-306).

So far, I'm doing both!

The Patent Office is like the SEC, as it turns out.

It is the best (says the WWU '03 *and* '06 person).