Disagreement, sure. 2 schools of thought, no. Most of us realize and routinely acknowledge the uncertainty re: health effects. Advocating for vaping altogether without acknowledging need for regulation to reduce youth appeal and prevent youth uptake seems naive and irresponsible.

This is a false dichotomy. There’s more nuance in the scientific discussion about the merits and/or harms of e-cigs. You somehow missed I am “they” and my “claims” regard my scientific results and their implications, which I believe. The suggestion there are “2 schools of thought” is false.

Thank you for the clearly baited lead into this with an ambiguous loaded question 🤣. I will read these with an open mind as soon as I am able.

What claims, and who are they?